munizfire
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2019
- Threads
- 16
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 55
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Mustang GT Premium
- Thread starter
- #1
I have a couple of questions; and please correct me if I'm wrong in any of my assumptions.
Yesterday I noticed that my front tires need replacing ASAP, since they're worn very badly in the insides (will replace all 4, the rear ones have a lot of meat left, but have dry rot as well). For all I know, my alignment could've been thrown off in the past couple of months, but both my front tires have similar wear patterns, so I doubt it [Will get it checked this week] (See below, both tires look very similar, but this one was a little bit worse than the driver's side)
Now, I understand these cars have a stock negative camber that will cause premature wear in the insides. However I do not know if the amount of wear shown is proportional to 'normal' wear for said negative camber. [Stock Pirelli PZero Neros, almost 30k miles, not rotated as often as I should've] I also have 1" spacers all the way around, and a friend was telling me that the spacers could be a factor to how 'uneven' my front tires are worn; I had my alignment checked a couple of weeks before installing the spacers and the alignment specs were compliant to stock specs.
1- Should spacers affect the alignment specs? Should there be any kind of accounting for the spacers while aligning the car? or does it really not matter?
2- Is this wear 'typical' for 30k on these cars? [I assume not, even taking into account the fact that I had only rotated the tires twice. Shame on me, I know]
3- Most of my commute is straight driving; should this be accounted for to 'increase' the camber?
4- Could more frequent rotation have delayed this?
thanks
Yesterday I noticed that my front tires need replacing ASAP, since they're worn very badly in the insides (will replace all 4, the rear ones have a lot of meat left, but have dry rot as well). For all I know, my alignment could've been thrown off in the past couple of months, but both my front tires have similar wear patterns, so I doubt it [Will get it checked this week] (See below, both tires look very similar, but this one was a little bit worse than the driver's side)
Now, I understand these cars have a stock negative camber that will cause premature wear in the insides. However I do not know if the amount of wear shown is proportional to 'normal' wear for said negative camber. [Stock Pirelli PZero Neros, almost 30k miles, not rotated as often as I should've] I also have 1" spacers all the way around, and a friend was telling me that the spacers could be a factor to how 'uneven' my front tires are worn; I had my alignment checked a couple of weeks before installing the spacers and the alignment specs were compliant to stock specs.
1- Should spacers affect the alignment specs? Should there be any kind of accounting for the spacers while aligning the car? or does it really not matter?
2- Is this wear 'typical' for 30k on these cars? [I assume not, even taking into account the fact that I had only rotated the tires twice. Shame on me, I know]
3- Most of my commute is straight driving; should this be accounted for to 'increase' the camber?
4- Could more frequent rotation have delayed this?
thanks
Sponsored