RustedAngel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2015
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 339
- Reaction score
- 231
- Location
- United States
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 350R HR215
- Thread starter
- #1
I've been seeing this topic pop up in and around other threads and after reading through them all...I figured it would be nice to stick all of the back and forth in one thread.
So.
Let loose!
It's an interesting topic I'd love to hear folks debate. Lots say Synchros eliminated the need.
The arguments for using it to get the intermediate shafts to speed are very interesting, and with all of the strange issues folks seem to have with the MT82, it's warrants a genuine discussion I think.
Just driving around today I figured I'd give it an entire session of DC only shifting...and even at speed, other than getting used to the timing differences...a lot of the notchy cold shifts were markedly improved. This IMO lending clout to the idea we still need to DC as our Synchros are lazy.
What say you?
So.
Let loose!
It's an interesting topic I'd love to hear folks debate. Lots say Synchros eliminated the need.
The arguments for using it to get the intermediate shafts to speed are very interesting, and with all of the strange issues folks seem to have with the MT82, it's warrants a genuine discussion I think.
Just driving around today I figured I'd give it an entire session of DC only shifting...and even at speed, other than getting used to the timing differences...a lot of the notchy cold shifts were markedly improved. This IMO lending clout to the idea we still need to DC as our Synchros are lazy.
What say you?
Sponsored