Performance Pack or not??

[Drew2000]

Hey guys, currently driving a 2011 GT. (non Track-Pak) Really didn't like the overly soft suspension, so I upgraded to Steeda Sport Springs and Koni SRT (orange) and really like the way the car handles now. Due to the crappy roads, I've kept the 235/50R-18's, they're okay, but the weak link. Wouldn't want the suspension too much firmer, just about right for the road conditions. Tested a regular GT, but the drive was on smooth suburban streets with lots of traffic and a douche-y salesman, so didn't get to push it much. They didn't have any PP on the lot.

Trying to get a handle on the 2015 "regular GT" vs PP. How much firmer is the regular GT than the previous version on twisty roads, or is it still pretty soft? The PP seems like a good deal, and I would like not having to change out the shocks/struts/springs again on a regular GT. Most likely would switch the PP tires to a ultra-high performance all season when they wear out as I like to drive in the cooler spring and fall.

My goal is a great-handling back-roads car, it's not a daily driver and I don't plan on tracking the car. A plus of the PP, is I plan on getting a base GT, and I like the upgraded dash and wheels. The larger radiator would also be a plus when stuck in heavy traffic which happens pretty often on the way to the country. If I understand correctly, all of the Euro Mustangs come with the PP as standard. Thanks for any input.

Sponsored

 

[cush]

Hey guys, currently driving a 2011 GT. (non Track-Pak) Really didn't like the overly soft suspension, so I upgraded to Steeda Sport Springs and Koni SRT (orange) and really like the way the car handles now. Due to the crappy roads, I've kept the 235/50R-18's, they're okay, but the weak link. Wouldn't want the suspension too much firmer, just about right for the road conditions. Tested a regular GT, but the drive was on smooth suburban streets with lots of traffic and a douche-y salesman, so didn't get to push it much. They didn't have any PP on the lot.

Trying to get a handle on the 2015 "regular GT" vs PP. How much firmer is the regular GT than the previous version on twisty roads, or is it still pretty soft? The PP seems like a good deal, and I would like not having to change out the shocks/struts/springs again on a regular GT. Most likely would switch the PP tires to a ultra-high performance all season when they wear out as I like to drive in the cooler spring and fall.

My goal is a great-handling back-roads car, it's not a daily driver and I don't plan on tracking the car. A plus of the PP, is I plan on getting a base GT, and I like the upgraded dash and wheels. The larger radiator would also be a plus when stuck in heavy traffic which happens pretty often on the way to the country. If I understand correctly, all of the Euro Mustangs come with the PP as standard. Thanks for any input.

I'm not sure what your experience is with driving both live rear axels and IRS, but even id the spring rates were the same, the IRS would handle better, by quite a bit. If you have not driven IRS in a rear wheel drive much or at all, the feel will take some getting used to, but once you are used to it, you'll never want to go back. It's like driving a truck and then getting into a semi decent sedan... that kind of difference. BTW, as far as I know the springs on the GT are the same as on the PP. The PP has heavier roll bars, and different rear shocks, and all the other stuff that comes in the package, Brembos, 2 different braces up front (K brace & Strut Tower brace), and then some slightly different electronic enhancements.

 

[Colleton]

I like the PP on my '15 fairly well. I really like the Brembo brakes and the Torsen diff but wish the axle ratio was 3.55 instead of 3.73, if only for gas mileage during my daily commute.

JMO, and keep in mind that I'm coming from a '14 GT500, but I think that even with the PP the car is under damped. Highway expansion joints really make the car pogo (double bounce). I'm thinking of putting stiffer shocks/springs on it, waiting to see what FRPP offers.

 

[Rv-Junke]

I like the PP on my '15 fairly well. I really like the Brembo brakes and the Torsen diff but wish the axle ratio was 3.55 instead of 3.73, if only for gas mileage during my daily commute.

JMO, and keep in mind that I'm coming from a '14 GT500, but I think that even with the PP the car is under damped. Highway expansion joints really make the car pogo (double bounce). I'm thinking of putting stiffer shocks/springs on it, waiting to see what FRPP offers.

I like my pp as well, and jury isn't out yet on ratio, I may go to 3:55. Time will tell.

 

[souprmage]

Hey guys, currently driving a 2011 GT. (non Track-Pak) Really didn't like the overly soft suspension, so I upgraded to Steeda Sport Springs and Koni SRT (orange) and really like the way the car handles now. Due to the crappy roads, I've kept the 235/50R-18's, they're okay, but the weak link. Wouldn't want the suspension too much firmer, just about right for the road conditions. Tested a regular GT, but the drive was on smooth suburban streets with lots of traffic and a douche-y salesman, so didn't get to push it much. They didn't have any PP on the lot.

Trying to get a handle on the 2015 "regular GT" vs PP. How much firmer is the regular GT than the previous version on twisty roads, or is it still pretty soft? The PP seems like a good deal, and I would like not having to change out the shocks/struts/springs again on a regular GT. Most likely would switch the PP tires to a ultra-high performance all season when they wear out as I like to drive in the cooler spring and fall.

My goal is a great-handling back-roads car, it's not a daily driver and I don't plan on tracking the car. A plus of the PP, is I plan on getting a base GT, and I like the upgraded dash and wheels. The larger radiator would also be a plus when stuck in heavy traffic which happens pretty often on the way to the country. If I understand correctly, all of the Euro Mustangs come with the PP as standard. Thanks for any input.

I think the PP will give you exactly what you're after. It's not too stiff, not made for the track. It's a sporty option with very good response, and it'll even work as a DD.

I think for the price, it's hard to beat it. If you had wanted something more for the track, a person could argue the PP just isn't stiff enough for that. But since you don't, I think you'll be happy with it.

 

[SVTFreak]

I was worried about the pp also when I got mine. I wanted something a little better riding. I can say the ride isn't bad. It's firm but not tooth jarring. The irs realy helps a lot. No regrets here.

 

[rj67]

I like my pp as well, and jury isn't out yet on ratio, I may go to 3:55. Time will tell.

+1 on the gear ratio. But then again it sure brings a smile to my face when I push down on the go pedal!

 

[Potrillo]

+1 on the gear ratio. But then again it sure brings a smile to my face when I push down on the go pedal!

The 3.55 does the same thing to mine. The smile fades a little at the pump.

 

[Strokerswild]

Depends on your wants and needs, everybody's different.

Personally, I won't buy one without the PP.....

 

[Potrillo]

I have a GT without PP but I do have the 3.55. I can't speak to the PP because I haven't even ridden in one. Compared to my 1999 convertible, it is on a whole different level. I do think that I want to do something with the suspension as it does have a little bounce. I am in no hurry as this car is amazing.

 

[rj67]

The 3.55 does the same thing to mine. The smile fades a little at the pump.

But it come right back!!!!! I'll take the little hit at the pump.

 

[Potrillo]

But it come right back!!!!! I'll take the little hit at the pump.

Yes it does.

 

[Ponykix]

Had a 2012GT and the stock suspension was too soft. I upgraded to the Roush Trak Pak suspension which was made by KW to Roush specs. The Roush is an extremely firm suspension that was great for track days but a little rough if you are looking for a comfortable daily drive.

I bought the Ecoboost with the PP and have to say I could not be happier. It handles great and has the firmness much like the Roush setup but much more comfortable as a daily driver.

Every sports or sporty car I have owned the first thing I did was upgrade the suspension because of poor handling usually as a result of being too "soft".

This is the first car that I have owned that the suspension was not my first priority. I am very impressed with handling and how confidence inspiring it is compared to some of my modified setups in the past. At this point I am not sure I will change anything in the suspension, so for me it is a great value.

 

[JolleyRoger]

I am struggling with the same considering I will more then likely be changing out the springs and sway bar for the Steeda components. You need to remember though that you get the gear change and the six piston Brembo package with that price upgrade.

I am not sure how much it would be to add bigger brakes in a non PP car if needed, but seems like an ok price for the package as a whole.

I do wish you had another option for wheels, but I am sure it is all tuned to work together; my guess as to why no wheel option with the PP.

 

[ThatsMrGimp2U]

Brakes being the heavy hitter, all the performance package adds will really rack up costs if done later. I did it for the bracing, sway bars, bigger radiator, and of course the brakes.

Sent from my XT1060 using Tapatalk

Sponsored