They should have done it anyway, to show what it's capable of. Scorch the earth.
I had two, a 2017 and a 2018. A separation and subsequent divorce caused their early departure.
Not trying to be an ass but F1 cars use paddle sift transmission no clutch on shift. Put the trans in sport mode, drive mode in track, and you have no electronics doing anything with gear selection only your paddle input. Only thing that would be better is if it was a DTC transmission!
hey now it's poor form to visually highlight the behavior of the A6 transmission in response to driver inputs. If anyone needs a handball to the face, it's Crusher.
Did you have any engine issues on those GT350s while in ownership? I'm still leery on the reliability and maint costs for track use even though love the flat plane and addicting red line.
A tune can take the Coyote to an 8200 hard redline. It's not worth going over 7800 though from a power stance. Nothing to really gain above 7800 unlike the Voodoo.
Even on a mach 1 with the gt350 manifold?
there's nothing special about the M1 vs Bullitt. Same config.
Yes. The 350 manifold has really good top end and high RPM power but the Coyote loses steam above 7800. The Voodoo has better heads for the high RPM I think. Haven't really looked into a comparison between the two but the manifold tests and dynos have showed that power above 7800 is not worth going higher on N/A. You would probably need new cams to really squeeze out more. The 8200 redline is so you don't hit the limiter and save your engine from OPG failure.
This is correct with my tune I can go to 8k. But like @Zelek said why. The 5.2 head is “CNC” machine before the engine is assembled. And the cam does have a different profile built for power in the high RPM. Also as @Zelek said, you could machine a set of coyote heads add some cams and springs and move your power band up into that range if you want to spin the engine to the moon!
