WildHorse
N/A or GO HOME
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2017
- Threads
- 270
- Messages
- 10,297
- Reaction score
- 8,350
- Location
- Home World: CLASSIFIED
- First Name
- Puddintane
- Vehicle(s)
- '17 S550
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
I don't think you understand boosting modern engines. Where's the restriction on stock coyotes ? You really think 1000 / 1100 / 1200 RWH FI STOCK ie: zero porting coyotes rolling out there today have any significant restriction whatsoever ? These engines aren't 60's 327 with ported camel heads that barely flow 220 cfm. Or even AFR's that flow 250 cfm. IF you're NA, that's a different story. 9000 rpm & big cams will need help. Show me one instance of a forced induction 9 second coyote that benefited from porting in any substantial way, or any engine making just 1/2lb more boost with porting. I'll tell yah : ZERO. There's no need. Ported/non ported there's a max amount of boost these engines will handle, and no amount of porting will help. It's been proven over and over. 7/8 second cars prove over and over porting isn't necessary. Just ask around.I'm not sure what you think that proves. Nobody said that stock manifolds do not perform well. So your point is moot. Now if someone is running in the 7s then that is a testament to a lot of different factors on the car and a ported manifold would likely be unnecessary. But for a street car with boost, if the owner wanted a good bump in power and acceleration, then a ported manifold would help. See, there is a huge difference between an all out 7 second race car and a street car pushing some boost. Also, why does every debate turn into someone talking about 7 second this and 8 second that? You do realize that any car running those speeds, the results are attributable to the entire car and all parts working together right? You know they aren't running 7s and the main reason is because the manifold is unported right?
Sponsored