Will Trump be impeached?

[GT Pony]

If you don't know what I stand for by now then you're hopeless. I think anyone with any ethics would want a fair House hearing and trial in the Senate. If you'd turn off the far right filter then you'd see by what's already been said that the Reps plan a sham trial - but that might be breaking down some. Trump has said that he wants everyone to testify in the Senate trial - watch around the 4:00 mark. That's seems to be a 180 since he and everyone in his admin stonewalled the House hearings.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/vide...44942a-bed4-43a8-aee1-b20e829fefc1_video.html

I've said it many times before, of course he's not going to be found guilty in the Senate because his clan will even throw thier oath of office down the toilet to exonerate him. Doesn't take much to see that.

Of course everyone is biased to some degree, and all politicians are crooked to some degree. I've said it many times and one reason I don't lean far left or right. Middle ground is away from fascism ... far left or right is fascism.

Sponsored

 

[GT Pony]

"Russia, if you're listening" ... get busy to play the USA for 2020, especially since Putin backs up Trump by his comments about the impeachment.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia...nal-campaign-committee-60-minutes-2019-11-24/

 

[Docscurlock]

Then why are you still here debating things that you're wrong about? I think you're the one suffering by being schooled about how impeachment works. I can do this for years and it's not going to bother me one bit. You keep replying, I keep doubling down, just like your idol Trump.

Because it is entertaining seeing your hypocrisy. First you state that you need evidence of wrongdoing by trump to decide if he is guilty. Then you revel in the fact that he has impeached(although it appears as though it is a botched job). Then you are already convinced that the new evidence has already pointed to his guilt anyway. The only fair trial is one that rehashes all the old evidence and keeps calling witnesses until one points at some guilt for something. You are just like Joseph Stalin in the Moscow trials. For your reading pleasure:
The Moscow Trials were a series of show trials held in the Soviet Union at the instigation of Joseph Stalin between 1936 and 1938 against Trotskyists and members of Right Opposition of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. There were three Moscow Trials: the Case of the Trotskyite-Zinovievite Terrorist Center (Zinoviev-Kamenev Trial, aka "Trial of the Sixteen," 1936), the Case of the Anti-Soviet Trotskyist Center (Pyatakov-Radek Trial, 1937), and the Case of the Anti-Soviet "Bloc of Rights and Trotskyites" (Bukharin-Rykov Trial, aka "Trial of the Twenty-One," 1938). The defendants of these were Old Bolshevik party leaders and top officials of the Soviet secret police. Most defendants were charged under Article 58 of the RSFSR Penal Code with conspiring with the Western powers to assassinate Stalin and other Soviet leaders, dismember the Soviet Union, and restore capitalism.

The Moscow Trials led to the execution of many of the defendants.

Welcome to the new America where you are guilty or innocent based upon your Party affiliation, your use of NewSpeak and your willingness to tow the New Democratic socialist party line and if GTPONY agrees with everything you have ever said or done. (Oh, gee, I'm screwed. Heading for the gallows myself.)
BTW, Merry Christmas, may all Christ's blessing find you and your family.

 

[Docscurlock]

If you don't know what I stand for by now then you're hopeless. I think anyone with any ethics would want a fair House hearing and trial in the Senate. If you'd turn off the far right filter then you'd see by what's already been said that the Reps plan a sham trial

and of course you in your unwavering goodness and high moral standards will stand up and point to the fairness of the House Impeachment Inquiry as the "standard" that all trials and depositions should be run by as long as the defendant is a conservative. President Trump shouldn't have any due process until we find someone who will point to a crime even if we have to send every person in America to prison for something until someone of good character stands up and folds on the President. If he wants due process, we invite him into our hearing as long as he and all of his witnesses follow our every rule and don't talk about anything that exonerates the defendant. He is not to be afforded any ridiculous rights such as facing his accuser, the right to attorney/client privledge, or the right to call any witnesses on his behalf and most of all, DO NOT Bring Up any Corruption on the Left as that is outside the scope of our hearing.

If the person is a liberal politician, just look away because there was probably a good reason for their actions and corruption is way below the morality of anyone on the left.

If anyone disagrees with my statements and decrees about how guilty the President is then he is obviously a deranged virus ridden Zombie who is guilty along with every one else on twitter of worshipping Trump as a false idol and I will help in scourging the earth of your ilk.

I hope someday you are living in this world that you are advocating.

 

[Docscurlock]

Very
classy
Lady!

 

[Docscurlock]

Not so classy

 

[GT Pony]

Dear Zombie in OK, I have responded many times to your statements above. Go back and find them since you're good at going back to find old posts.

Nope ... just calling it like it is. Moscow Mitch will protect his little child from the big bad Libs, lol. He's as crooked as any of them and everyone knows it. The longer this all goes on the more people will see how crooked and deceiving the Reps really are. Trump indicating that he wanting anyone to come testify during the Senate trial was his hope to fool the public into thinking he's an honest guy, but he forgot ... where was his thoughts on that during the House hearings? ... stonewalled.

^^^ From someone who doesn't even understand the Constitution.

Haven't given my verdict ... you can't read any better than any other brainwashed citizen. I've said there needs to be more investigation because what's already been shown is reason to look further into the situation. Obviously you and ol' Doc have come to the conclusion that he's innocent of any wrong doing without presenting all the possible evidence into the case. You'd both make great criminal defense lawyers.

Nobody should like the Russians ... unless they are helping you out to win the next election.

Merry Christmas.

 

[GT Pony]

Because it is entertaining seeing your hypocrisy. First you state that you need evidence of wrongdoing by trump to decide if he is guilty. Then you revel in the fact that he has impeached(although it appears as though it is a botched job). Then you are already convinced that the new evidence has already pointed to his guilt anyway. The only fair trial is one that rehashes all the old evidence and keeps calling witnesses until one points at some guilt for something. You are just like Joseph Stalin in the Moscow trials.

He's been impeached ... you're still hanging on to thinking he's not? It hasn't been botched, just more misconceptions on how the process works. Even the simplest things you will not accept is pretty telling about the level of infection. What new evidence? There hasn't been any since the hearings. I said there could be new evidence if the people who haven't testified (because of stonewalling) are allowed to. What are you afraid of if they did? If everything is on the up and up, then Trump will be exonerated fairly for all to see and accept. Don't you want to see an actual trail go on instead of a big obvious sham pulled off by the Reps. Yeah, I know in your mind since the Dems have seemed to play dirty, I guess it's the Reps turn to do the same ... no surprise there. Tit for tat is fair, right.

The Moscow Trials ....
Welcome to the new America ...

You must be talking about the Moscow Mitch (or is it Captain Kangaroo) trial that's coming up, lol.

BTW, Merry Christmas, may all Christ's blessing find you and your family.

Same to you.

 

[GT Pony]

Very
classy
Lady!

And someone that accepts and puts up with adultery. Her and Hillary have some things in common.

 

[GT Pony]

and of course you in your unwavering goodness and high moral standards will stand up and point to the fairness of the House Impeachment Inquiry as the "standard" that all trials and depositions should be run by as long as the defendant is a conservative.

People from Trump's admin where invited & subpoenaed to come testify in the House hearings ... nobody showed up. Fail at democracy ... win at a coverup. And they are again invited to come testify in the Senate trial. What do you think their response will be?

I hope someday you are living in this world that you are advocating.

I hope someday we're not all living under this party.

 

[Docscurlock]

People from Trump's admin where invited & subpoenaed to come testify in the House hearings ... nobody showed up.

If you can type with a straight face that the Democratic Impeachment Inquiry was set up to offer fair due process to the President, I will concede that he is actually impeached.

 

[Docscurlock]

And someone that accepts and puts up with adultery. ]

Their marriage is not my problem, maybe they have an open marriage. This is 2019.

 

[Docscurlock]

You must be talking about the Moscow Mitch (or is it Captain Kangaroo) trial that's coming up, lol.

See, you can't even argue your facts without some type of derision to Trump or a conservative. It is impossible for you to look at this fairly. I have accepted your position as a partisan leftie, drop it will ya.

 

[GT Pony]

If you can type with a straight face that the Democratic Impeachment Inquiry was set up to offer fair due process to the President, I will concede that he is actually impeached.

Well, why do you think Trump stonewalled it? They wanted more people to testify ... what's unfair about that?

And there were some people that did come testify that were supporting his admin because they probably didn't want go possibly go to jail later down the road. Did you even watch the House hearings, or just lapping up the Faux News summaries while it was going on?

Here's typical flip-flopping smoke and mirrors from Trump.
https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...ove-to-have-officials-testify-but-is-fighting

PS - He's impeached, and history will show that occurred on Dec 18, 2019.

Sponsored