Stage_3
Well-Known Member
^^BINGO!!!Technically he has not been impeached. Yet.
He's had "charges" brought against him, that's about it. The Senate votes on actual impeachment.
Sponsored
^^BINGO!!!Technically he has not been impeached. Yet.
I really don’t know. I have been reading this guys blog for years. He has great insights and his opinion section is very good.I decided for the sake of my sanity to remove myself from this thread quite some time ago. That said I've been following it and really enjoy the banter between Bill & GTPony.
Jay, you are spot on. The hatred you mention existed before the 2016 election but it certainly has gotten much worse in the past three years. I had friends that I used to be able to have a civil conversation with but now it's impossible. The two sides are so entrenched that no one can hear one another.
I do have one hypothetical though. It the Dem’s were to allow Schiff, and Hunter & Joe Biden to testify would the Republicans allow Mulvaney, Bolton, and Pompeo to do the same?
No skin in the game, just wondering.
Technically impeachment is done as soon as the announcement is made in the senate and the gavel is brought down.^^BINGO!!!
He's had "charges" brought against him, that's about it. The Senate votes on actual impeachment.
Feldman, who testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee's impeachment proceedings earlier this month, argues in a Bloomberg Op-Ed that the framers' definition of impeachment "assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote," and that "Strictly speaking, "impeachment" occurred – and occurs -- when the articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate for trial. And at that point, the Senate is obliged by the Constitution to hold a trial."Read the PDF links under "Constitutional Authority". Website is right from the US Senate.
https://www.senate.gov/reference/Index/Impeachment.htm
Although the term “impeachment” is commonly used to refer to the removal of a government official from office, the impeachment process, as described in the Constitution, entails two distinct proceedings carried out by the separate houses of Congress. First, a simple majority of the House impeaches—or formally approves allegations of wrong doing amounting to an impeachable offense, known as articles of impeachment. The articles of impeachment are then forwarded to the Senate where the second proceeding takes place: an impeachment trial. If the Senate, by vote of a two-thirds majority, convicts the official of the alleged offenses, the result is removal from office of those still in office, and, at the Senate’s discretion, disqualification from holding future office.
The House impeaches (the official charges of offenses - Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress in Trump's case). The Senate convicts or acquits the impeachment charges bases on an impeachment trial. Being officially impeached means you've been officially charged with offenses by the House. You can't even get to the Senate trial without being officially impeached by the House. So technically, Trump has been officially impeached.
Many people have the misconception that you have to be convinced and removed from office to be officially impeached. You don't ... you get officially impeached in the House, and once officially impeached it then goes to the Senate trial for conviction or acquittal of the official impeachment charges.
If you read the info on the US Senate link I gave above, I see nothing that says articles of impeachment can be "withdrawn" by the House. And for bjstang, there is nothing I can find that says the articles of impeachment have to be submitted for trial by a certain time, or when the trial has to start after the impeachment happens by the House. You think all these chess moves on both sides aren't looked at first from a rules/laws viewpoint? ... don't be naive.Feldman, who testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee's impeachment proceedings earlier this month, argues in a Bloomberg Op-Ed that the framers' definition of impeachment "assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote," and that "Strictly speaking, "impeachment" occurred – and occurs -- when the articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate for trial. And at that point, the Senate is obliged by the Constitution to hold a trial."
If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.
That’s because “impeachment” under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.
As for the headlines we saw after the House vote saying, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message. -Noah Feldman
I’m not a Harvard law professor but he is. Argue with him.


Sounds like what could be said is there is just not a lot of precedent here. I would image there is just not any case law for impeachment.If you read the info on the US Senate link I gave above, I see nothing that says articles of impeachment can be "withdrawn" by the House. How I read it all, is once the official articles of impeachment are official, the next step in the process is the Senate trial. There has never been any impeachment that has not gone to a Senate trial except for the 3 guys who resigned before the Senate trial took place (info in one of those PDFs in the US Senate link). There wouldn't be any real reason to not move on to the trial when the time is right.
By the way, I voted for Rudy Giuliani in 1994 back when I lived in New York City. He was a hell of a US attorney, although many really disliked him. I move to NJ in 95' but was very glad i voted for him on 9/11. He really was an excellent mayor.along with Rudy
In that Senate website PDF, the 3 guys who resigned are still considered to have been officially impeached without ever going to Senate trial, so that just enforces the fact that you don't have to go to trial to make the impeachment official.Sounds like what could be said is there is just not a lot of precedent here. I would image there is just not any case law for impeachment.
That said, impeachment law seems to be very vague in many different ways.
If Nancy Pelosi never turns the articles over to the Senate is Trump indefinitely impeached? Or does impeachment actually happen after the senate receives them?
Does the sixth amendment factor into this at all if he is already impeached? Or by waiting and not turning them over does Trump not have this right?
People are getting tired of this though. The poll numbers are starting to look very bad. Let’s hope this comes to a conclusion soon.
He's been infected with the TZV, and is even more power hungry as a result than he was back then.By the way, I voted for Rudy Giuliani in 1994 back when I lived in New York City. He was a hell of a US attorney, although many really disliked him. I move to NJ in 95' but was very glad i voted for him on 9/11. He really was an excellent mayor.
I do not know who this person is that I now see on the TV. He certainly is not the man I remember as mayor of NYC. By the way Rudy was originally a Democrat and a Liberal. Go figure.
