Sponsored

Oversteer vs Understeer: Which is better? (DriveTribe Article)

Roadway 5.0

Strassejager
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Threads
57
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,780
Location
New York - USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016GT PP 6MT
Vehicle Showcase
1
This makes for a good Sunday read:

https://drivetribe.com/p/understeer...muylRkmaF8U0fmgDeg?iid=KM33_VDFR_CmD5vsfWZgdg

It also brings up some discussion questions:

How “much” understeer do the S550 models have from the factory?

If modifying swaybars only, and all else staying equal, what configurations/rates does it take to hit, say, “10%” understeer, “neutral”, or "10%" oversteer?

Just some open-ended thoughts to get the day going.

-Mike
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Randy Pobst is on record as favoring understeer. Light understeer, whatever that means (I think he tried to define it a little in some issue of the SCCA's monthly magazine). My own take is that if you find oversteer too easy to come by, you'll consciously or subconsciously leave a little more margin against that happening. Either by leaving a few more hundredths of a g of tire grip unused, or by being slower/later/more gradual in your throttle application as you get back into that.

To the best of my knowledge, understeer is still best quantified in terms of an "understeer budget", which can either be a positive number (for "understeer") or a negative one ("oversteer"). This isn't a percentage thing; it's a comparison of the totals of a number of cornering compliances (front minus rear) and ends up being expressed in degrees per g.

Straight out of RCVD

full.jpg


It's probably best to assume that most or all of the individual terms are themselves somewhat variable over the range of cornering g's. IOW, not the same numbers or even numbers in the same proportions at 1.0g as at 0.25g.


Norm
 
Last edited:

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
41
Messages
5,661
Reaction score
4,682
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
The more I drive with different swaybar, shock, and spring settings, the more I feel that as long as its reasonably close to neutral, and not biased too far in either direction, the driver can adapt. I no longer have a strong preference for over/understeer, but a car close to neutral is very rewarding because weight transfer with throttle can quickly plant the rear down, and weight transfer forward by breathing on the brakes can glue the front and get the car to turn.

Ona road course, (and going for lap times), slight understeer is reportedly best. You can maximize your speeds on the straights be being more confident and aggressive planting the throttle to the floor earlier and harder coming out of corners.

Slight oversteer can be a blast to drive, assuming you’ve mastered it. Its like an art form or balancing act. The car will throttle steer well mid corner, but it can be a handfull on corner exit if you arent used to it.

The stock PP car is a little biased to understeer, but its dynamics are close enough that with a sporty alignment its not going to hold back most drivers. Later, I had a lot of fun with a mildly stiffer rear swaybar and squared tires, and the car was a little oversteery in that configuration. After a few years like that I put the stock rear bar back on and learned to drive a stiff front bar. The car definitely understeered that way but it did a number of things well. The most fun tho was with a stiffer front bar AND a mild rear bar with square tires, it seems the most balanced this way, able to understeer or oversteer based on driver inputs.
 

dmann

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Threads
67
Messages
346
Reaction score
44
Location
Alabama
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP1
The stock PP car is a little biased to understeer, but its dynamics are close enough that with a sporty alignment its not going to hold back most drivers. Later, I had a lot of fun with a mildly stiffer rear swaybar and squared tires, and the car was a little oversteery in that configuration. After a few years like that I put the stock rear bar back on and learned to drive a stiff front bar. The car definitely understeered that way but it did a number of things well. The most fun tho was with a stiffer front bar AND a mild rear bar with square tires, it seems the most balanced this way, able to understeer or oversteer based on driver inputs.
that's good feedback.
thanks
 

Sponsored

Performance nut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Threads
178
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
626
Location
TX
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
I prefer having my car understeer in the corners but not a significant amount, almost neutral. With a high horsepower RWD vehicle, I have unlimited supply of throttle oversteer. If your car is set for oversteer naturally, I haven't figured out how to induce understeer on the fly. Plus cars that oversteer tend to have too many "oh shit" moments for my taste. Understeer cars are more forgiving. Unless you are a perfect driver who knows his crap back and forth and back again, we all need forgiveness now and then.

With that said, the base GT had a cubic shit ton of oversteer. Dear god man, I started to wonder if the damn steering wheel worked at all above 30mph. I'm exaggerating but jeez laweez it really pushed in the turns. My 2018 was better than my 2016 but still pushed. A popular combo for sway bars is having an aftermarket front that is adjustable and a PP rear. I have a GT350R front and rear sway bar with some rather stiff springs and it use to push just barely. Still troubleshooting why it doesn't anymore.
 

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,765
Reaction score
593
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
The 2018 PP1 with magneride understeers quite a bit in stock form. Sure, you can nail the throttle to whip the tail out, but in controlled cornering you feel the tendency to understeer. Just installed the new rims and tires with a square setup yesterday (using 5mm front and 3mm rear spacers), and now the car has a tendency to oversteer. I may have to do some work to get closer to neutral. While oversteer can be fun, I feel that it is more restrictive when trying to push the car as an amateur.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Just installed the new rims and tires with a square setup yesterday
Up to what size tires and wheel widths?


and now the car has a tendency to oversteer. I may have to do some work to get closer to neutral.
Wait until you've run up at least a couple hundred miles of gradually increasing "enthusiasm" before making this kind of evaluation.


Norm
 

Cardude99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Threads
69
Messages
2,473
Reaction score
1,060
Location
Phoenix, AZ
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ecoboost
The 2018 PP1 with magneride understeers quite a bit in stock form. Sure, you can nail the throttle to whip the tail out, but in controlled cornering you feel the tendency to understeer. Just installed the new rims and tires with a square setup yesterday (using 5mm front and 3mm rear spacers), and now the car has a tendency to oversteer. I may have to do some work to get closer to neutral. While oversteer can be fun, I feel that it is more restrictive when trying to push the car as an amateur.
I thought it was just me. My car understeers like crazy. To me it's too much, working on trying to reduce it. Inducing oversteer with an eco is not as easy as with a GT. At least not in stock form
 

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,765
Reaction score
593
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
Up to what size tires and wheel widths?
19x9.5 with 285/35/19 on all 4 corners. Using 5mm spacer (to clear Brembos) in front and 3mm in back.


Wait until you've run up at least a couple hundred miles of gradually increasing "enthusiasm" before making this kind of evaluation.


Norm
It could also be that I am not used to the tires. Going from PS4 to RE71R is a big change. I know I will need to get them hotter in order to see the real balance, but my first impressions are that I went from mild understeer to oversteer.
 

Sponsored

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
19x9.5 with 285/35/19 on all 4 corners. Using 5mm spacer (to clear Brembos) in front and 3mm in back.



It could also be that I am not used to the tires. Going from PS4 to RE71R is a big change. I know I will need to get them hotter in order to see the real balance, but my first impressions are that I went from mild understeer to oversteer.
You also flattened out the rake of the car while doing so, going from a 27.0" front, 27.7" rear to a 26.9" all around. The rear of the car dropped almost 3/8", while the front hardly any. This means less static weight on the front of the car, with more or less the same weight transfer.
 

bootlegger

Enginerd
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Threads
9
Messages
1,765
Reaction score
593
Location
Mount Pleasant, SC
First Name
James
Vehicle(s)
Ex 2008 Mustang GT Owner
You also flattened out the rake of the car while doing so, going from a 27.0" front, 27.7" rear to a 26.9" all around. The rear of the car dropped almost 3/8", while the front hardly any. This means less static weight on the front of the car, with more or less the same weight transfer.
Wonder what it would feel like going with larger spacers in the rear. I imagine that would make things more neutral, but I am guessing I would need proper spacers with longer studs.
 
OP
OP
Roadway 5.0

Roadway 5.0

Strassejager
Joined
Dec 19, 2016
Threads
57
Messages
1,483
Reaction score
1,780
Location
New York - USA
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2016GT PP 6MT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I’m 100% on your side. I suppose it’s a track-king versus street-carver situation, but for what I like to experience in my drive a larger rear bar with the stock PP front bar produces exactly the dynamic I enjoy. Turns are flat, and where I steer I go...telepathically.

Interesting the stats on the new 2020 EcoBoost. I’m curious to the PP2’s sway bar sizes as well, though I can’t seem to find the specifics.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
9,011
Reaction score
4,721
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
You also flattened out the rake of the car while doing so, going from a 27.0" front, 27.7" rear to a 26.9" all around. The rear of the car dropped almost 3/8", while the front hardly any. This means less static weight on the front of the car, with more or less the same weight transfer.
The CG did move rearward, but I don't think that the amount it moved could be by enough to matter. I'm seeing 46.0% rear weight become something like 46.05% (gaining around 2 lbs) - it's a side view geometric solution involving fairly shallow triangles and arcs drawn about the front stub axle.

It's easy to assume that changes in the relation between front and rear ride height are due to "weight" moving around, but we know that didn't happen. The sprung mass just rotated slightly about the front axle.


Norm
Sponsored

 
 




Top