Sponsored

Alignment for oversteer.

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Ok so I absolutely detest understeer, lets be clear on that.
Ideally I'd like to end up with a fairly neutral balance, but if I'm going to choose one over the other, I'll take oversteer please.
Rear has to be set at -1.8 degrees for rear tyre clearance to the guard.
Front camber and all toe settings are up for grabs.
Car is driven fairly aggressively on the street. Random track days will occur, but they aren't the primary focus.
Tyre wear isn't a huge factor, I'm far more likely to kill them with skids and slides than through pure mileage. Hint: I tend to steer it with the throttle quite a bit.
Tyres are 275/295, so a slight bias the wrong way by design.
Suggestions please :cheers:
Sponsored

 

Gibbo205

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2015
Threads
156
Messages
6,673
Reaction score
2,207
Location
UK
Vehicle(s)
UK 2015 Mustang & BMW E46 M3
I've setup quite a lot of different cars.

For induce oversteer you want more front-end grip and less rear-end grip.

As such try the easiest modification, soften the front, stiffen the rear. Best solution for this would be to set the rear swaybar on full stiffness and the front swaybar on softest setting.

If you don't have adjustable bars, next step is tire pressures, set your fronts at 32psi and rears at 36-38psi, those are cold pressures.

If you can adjust you suspension height, increase rear ride height.

Onto the suspension setup.

The quickest and easiest one to try is toe settings, just focus on the rear as its a very easy adjustment, toe in provides more rear-end grip both off the line and during lateral acceleration. Toe out will make the rear-end loose, very lose and potentially losing control lose under hard braking, so be careful how far you go but in short setting the rear toe to neutral would be a good start and see how you like the balance.

Then to improve front-end grip on a hard driven car, more camber the better, the trade off being more likely to tramline etc, but try to get front camber around -2.00 and the toe at neutral.

See how that feels. :)
 
OP
OP
Burkey

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I've setup quite a lot of different cars.

For induce oversteer you want more front-end grip and less rear-end grip.

As such try the easiest modification, soften the front, stiffen the rear. Best solution for this would be to set the rear swaybar on full stiffness and the front swaybar on softest setting.

If you don't have adjustable bars, next step is tire pressures, set your fronts at 32psi and rears at 36-38psi, those are cold pressures.

If you can adjust you suspension height, increase rear ride height.

Onto the suspension setup.

The quickest and easiest one to try is toe settings, just focus on the rear as its a very easy adjustment, toe in provides more rear-end grip both off the line and during lateral acceleration. Toe out will make the rear-end loose, very lose and potentially losing control lose under hard braking, so be careful how far you go but in short setting the rear toe to neutral would be a good start and see how you like the balance.

Then to improve front-end grip on a hard driven car, more camber the better, the trade off being more likely to tramline etc, but try to get front camber around -2.00 and the toe at neutral.

See how that feels. :)
Thanks Gibbo.
Bars are already set full stiff in the rear and middle on the front.
-2.0 on the front sounds completely feasible.
Hadn't even thought about the role of tyre pressures to be honest :headbonk:
Rear toe is a strategy I will certainly pursue. :cheers:
As always, sound advice.
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
42
Messages
5,683
Reaction score
4,699
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Well you're biased towards rear grip with your staggered tires, so that's your main issue.

Your main ways to adjust understeer/oversteer will be adjustable swaybars and adjustable shocks, if you have those. Tires pressures maybe too.

To get neutral balance w/ square tires, I like a slightly stiffer rear swaybar bias. (which you have)

If 1.8 camber in the rear, then try as much as 2.5 camber in the front.

Front toe 0 degrees or slightly toe out if you don't mind it a little darty. Go 0 toe if you don't want it darty but still want it nimble.

Slight toe-in rear for stability under acceleration and to keep the rear from stepping out too quickly while powering out of the corner. I would NOT recommend toe out in the rear. It WILL give you mad oversteer, but not in a very friendly or controllable fashion. Think cars and coffee crashes... that kind of oversteer.
 

jasonstang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
18
Messages
5,551
Reaction score
1,296
Location
Omaha, NE
Vehicle(s)
2017 GB GT/CS 6MT
Stiffer rear sway bar and softer front.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Burkey

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Well you're biased towards rear grip with your staggered tires, so that's your main issue.

Your main ways to adjust understeer/oversteer will be adjustable swaybars and adjustable shocks, if you have those. Tires pressures maybe too.

To get neutral balance w/ square tires, I like a slightly stiffer rear swaybar bias. (which you have)

If 1.8 camber in the rear, then try as much as 2.5 camber in the front.

Front toe 0 degrees or slightly toe out if you don't mind it a little darty. Go 0 toe if you don't want it darty but still want it nimble.

Slight toe-in rear for stability under acceleration and to keep the rear from stepping out too quickly while powering out of the corner. I would NOT recommend toe out in the rear. It WILL give you mad oversteer, but not in a very friendly or controllable fashion. Think cars and coffee crashes... that kind of oversteer.
Much appreciated. A little "darty" doesn't bother me if it means more precision on turn in. :cheers:
What happens at cars n coffee? :lol:
 

qtrracer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2016
Threads
1
Messages
300
Reaction score
91
Location
California
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
16 GT Premium PP Recaros; 86 GT 'Vert Pro-touring
I tried about 5/32" total toe-out on the front, with -2.5* camber. -2* camber on the rear and about 3/32" toe-in. Factory stager on a PP car. I also have .25" spacers on the front to help bring the track widths more in line. Skid pad indicated a very slight rear traction bias. Very hard to gauge but the front let go first more often.

So I went to stiffer rear rebound, and 1/32 total toe in on the front. All other measurements stayed the same. Well the rear was too loose and the front lost some grip too. Too many changes. Going to a new base setting and thereafter trying one change at a time. More effort and very slow but it's the only way when a one man crew.
 
OP
OP
Burkey

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I tried about 5/32" total toe-out on the front, with -2.5* camber. -2* camber on the rear and about 3/32" toe-in. Factory stager on a PP car. I also have .25" spacers on the front to help bring the track widths more in line. Skid pad indicated a very slight rear traction bias. Very hard to gauge but the front let go first more often.

So I went to stiffer rear rebound, and 1/32 total toe in on the front. All other measurements stayed the same. Well the rear was too loose and the front lost some grip too. Too many changes. Going to a new base setting and thereafter trying one change at a time. More effort and very slow but it's the only way when a one man crew.
Much appreciated. I'd love to hear the results
Sponsored

 
 




Top