wildcatgoal
@sirboom_photography
The PP2 seems to be excellent for auto cars.
From what I gathered from speaking with FP, they seemingly either did not test it (or test sufficiently) on a PP 3.73 car or did not test this in less-than-40* weather or did not test this in a wide enough variety of cars, presumably just a small test fleet. I have to believe they did... I mean... "performance package" seems to elicit "we should probably make the tune work for this car the absolute best" but maybe I'm biased. Certainly they did engine-out tuning since that's how they've dyno'd to get their numbers. There's ALWAYS tweaks, especially with human throttle input, that needs doing when the engine and tune is in the car. When I gave them my car's specs, they said they'd have to get a PP car and throw winter tires on it to test out the issues I was having. I would have thought they already had a few! Maybe I misunderstood of over-read their comments, but later someone got a message saying flat out that the tune was heavily researched and needed no changes.
The power the FP tune delivers is awesome. I can live, I guess, with the excessive "not warm yet" engine rev hang, which was never exhibited with my car in stock form. I cannot live with the random "engine is warm" rev hang and over-done jolts into engine braking - I need predictability over power on a road course. I can't be getting thrown off by the engine not going into engine braking at the same time always when I let off the gas (stock there is a slight delay but it happens same time, every time), instead taking some random amount of time to decide to do so, then jolting into engine braking. That could put me into the pebbles if I'm in the wrong spot at the wrong time.
From what I gathered from speaking with FP, they seemingly either did not test it (or test sufficiently) on a PP 3.73 car or did not test this in less-than-40* weather or did not test this in a wide enough variety of cars, presumably just a small test fleet. I have to believe they did... I mean... "performance package" seems to elicit "we should probably make the tune work for this car the absolute best" but maybe I'm biased. Certainly they did engine-out tuning since that's how they've dyno'd to get their numbers. There's ALWAYS tweaks, especially with human throttle input, that needs doing when the engine and tune is in the car. When I gave them my car's specs, they said they'd have to get a PP car and throw winter tires on it to test out the issues I was having. I would have thought they already had a few! Maybe I misunderstood of over-read their comments, but later someone got a message saying flat out that the tune was heavily researched and needed no changes.
The power the FP tune delivers is awesome. I can live, I guess, with the excessive "not warm yet" engine rev hang, which was never exhibited with my car in stock form. I cannot live with the random "engine is warm" rev hang and over-done jolts into engine braking - I need predictability over power on a road course. I can't be getting thrown off by the engine not going into engine braking at the same time always when I let off the gas (stock there is a slight delay but it happens same time, every time), instead taking some random amount of time to decide to do so, then jolting into engine braking. That could put me into the pebbles if I'm in the wrong spot at the wrong time.
Sponsored