Sponsored

Paxton 3.6 pulley dyno

Tugger50H

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Threads
56
Messages
259
Reaction score
50
Location
STL
First Name
Tony
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
So finally got time to get on the dyno and a little disappointed with results but optimistic for the potential since the car does run great.

3.6 pulley, id 1000s, stock air box, long tube headers with cats.

Best run 602hp 471 torque on dynojet. Really thought this setup would be around 675. Any thoughts?

Mechanical boost gauge read 12lbs of boost so don't think I have a leak.
Sponsored

 

Slamdcoop0428

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Threads
30
Messages
839
Reaction score
473
Location
SW Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium auto
That does seem low as on a mustang dyno i put down 680whp on e85. So 730whp on a dynojet with my 3.6 pulley. Done get down on your numbers. See what it does at the track.
 

Terminator2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
448
Location
Spring Hill Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
So finally got time to get on the dyno and a little disappointed with results but optimistic for the potential since the car does run great.

3.6 pulley, id 1000s, stock air box, long tube headers with cats.

Best run 602hp 471 torque on dynojet. Really thought this setup would be around 675. Any thoughts?

Mechanical boost gauge read 12lbs of boost so don't think I have a leak.
Should have tried removing the stock airbox for a couple pulls. At those power levels it should be robbing a decent chunk of power.
 

Sponsored

dubster99

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Threads
45
Messages
2,517
Reaction score
437
Location
Nor*Cal
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ingot Silver GT PP
Every dyno is different.
 
OP
OP
Tugger50H

Tugger50H

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Threads
56
Messages
259
Reaction score
50
Location
STL
First Name
Tony
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
OP those numbers on pump gas?
Pump gas 93 octane. Been on this dyno a couple of times and I would say it's usually on par with whats been reported on the forums.

So my NA run same dyno ( I know different day) shows I have gained 193 HP with this kit for comparison.

Tune looked good maybe a little rich on the midrange but nothing to sweat.
 
OP
OP
Tugger50H

Tugger50H

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Threads
56
Messages
259
Reaction score
50
Location
STL
First Name
Tony
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
That does seem low as on a mustang dyno i put down 680whp on e85. So 730whp on a dynojet with my 3.6 pulley. Done get down on your numbers. See what it does at the track.
Not down on it. Worse case scenario I have a baseline for upcoming mods with the supercharger. Best case scenario it's something small and there is more power on the table.
 

16MustangVet

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
349
Reaction score
94
Location
North Dakota
Vehicle(s)
2016 mustang 5.0
Pump gas 93 octane. Been on this dyno a couple of times and I would say it's usually on par with whats been reported on the forums.

So my NA run same dyno ( I know different day) shows I have gained 193 HP with this kit for comparison.

Tune looked good maybe a little rich on the midrange but nothing to sweat.
On pump gas and headers id say those #s look great imo.

i think people with stock headers make more tq but restriction makes tq but aftermarket headers obviously flow better. since the headers are on id be looking to add e85 and drop pulley a bit if it were my car.

dude above made more hp but hes on e85 thats why my 1st question was if you were on pump. 78hp difference gas vs e85 sounds pretty decent i think.

cars got room to grow looks like its going in right direction!
 

Sponsored
OP
OP
Tugger50H

Tugger50H

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Threads
56
Messages
259
Reaction score
50
Location
STL
First Name
Tony
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
I made 660 on 93 and I made 730 on 110 on a 3.6. What is your ignition set at
Not sure what you mean about what my ignition set at.

The tuner running the dyno thought the cam timing looked different than what he typically uses and was going to compare the logs with another car he recently built and tuned with a similar setup.
 

christian

Happy Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Threads
37
Messages
264
Reaction score
71
Location
Bellefonte, PA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT
Ignition set=your degrees of timing added. I'm thinking your around 12* with those numbers
 

turbo50

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
235
Reaction score
35
Location
virginia beach
Vehicle(s)
5.0
Not sure what you mean about what my ignition set at.

The tuner running the dyno thought the cam timing looked different than what he typically uses and was going to compare the logs with another car he recently built and tuned with a similar setup.
Well if your not running a standalone Edu then your cam angles should be like everyone else to my understanding. I think your tuner played it safe and didn't push the ignition.
 

Pincushin3819

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2016
Threads
25
Messages
514
Reaction score
148
Location
SC
Vehicle(s)
17 Paxton GT
Don't most tuners have around 16 degrees of timing on 93? I wouldn't pulley down if your 93 especially if your on 12lbs with headers already. Maybe add timing if your really around 12 or add a intake that will probably give you another lb or so & around 25-30hp.
Sponsored

 
 








Top