Sponsored

My Livernois Experience

Warmart

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Threads
1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT CO - Me; 2016 GT RR - Fiance
This is probably going to be a huge post, so don't act like I didn't warn you :D

I've had my DD 2016 GT Premium auto in CO for almost 3 months and have been lurking my arse off here for all of that time. Although I was thrilled with the power in my Mustang, it didn't take me long to notice some repeatable throttle lag and shift issues and so I spent a ton of time researching aftermarket tunes and intakes in hopes of an even more thrilling drive.

It's pretty obvious that Lund is the most loved mail order tune here with Livernois most likely falling into 2nd place (arguably). Regardless, I fought a long running mind debate between these two and weighed the prons/cons for and against an nGauge, etc. I sent some "feeler" pm's to a few vendors and received by far the best response from the Livernois rep here on the forums, and it sold me on going with them.

On Sept. 20th I ordered their MyCal tuner, Severe Windstorm CAI and Evenflo 160 thermostat bundle. I had quite a few messages with their rep prior to this as I found many complaints about the thermostat not actually providing any lowering of CHT. The rep stood behind the thermostat and swore that it performs as advertised.

On the following Friday I started the install. I used hose clamp pliers on the hose below the housing and caught most of the runoff in a gallon ziplock bag. My first issue is that the thermostat and o-ring popped out on me and I didn't realize the o-ring was supposed to go into the engine housing AFTER the thermostat. Needless to say, I had a pretty bad leak immediately. Thinking the o-ring just got kinked, I took it apart and tried it again. At first it was fine but within 30 minutes it began dripping and then it got real bad. I said the heck with it and took it to a shop, stopping along the way to refill the coolant. By that time I had an email from a Livernois tech saying I probably had the o-ring in wrong. At this point I just let someone that was less stupid fix it for me. $93 lesson learned, although it probably could've been averted with a simple instruction sheet in the thermostat box. Still my fault, obviously, but in my defense it's been 25+ years since I messed with a thermostat, and they've changed a wee bit. :shrug:

Then I got back home later Friday and installed the CAI (relatively easy although some of the hoses were persnickety) and then loaded up the 93 tune and took it for a drive. Like most people I immediately noticed the difference and I was really happy. Then, I had some odd lag when taking off from a stop and a CEL quickly popped up. I figured it was just the "learning" phase and I could clear it. I cleared the CEL and 3 codes (two were different "too lean" dtc's and the other was torque related) but they came back all weekend long. I tried reflashing the tune, etc. The tech was responding to me well on Saturday and started to suspect that I was given the wrong CAI (with a more restrictive tube that didn't require a tune), and he mentioned that this has happened before. I took some pictures of the inside of the tube via the airbox and on Monday the tech confirmed that I had the wrong CAI. Ugh. For the time being I loaded another tune they had provided which was for a stock intake. I never got another CEL or dtc.

At this point I was pretty hot, sure it was a simple mistake but it shouldn't have happened. I also mentioned that I was seeing exactly the same CHT's as with the stock thermostat and reiterated the need for a simple instruction sheet. They said they'd get me a replacement air tube and airbox cover (different logo and a larger window for aesthetics only) sent out, but they've totally blown off any questions I had about the CHT temps.

On Wednesday of last week the replacements arrived (plus a nice t-shirt and hat, thanks Livernois :headbang:) and I had the joy of fighting the air tube fitment all over again, this time mostly in the dark (not recommended :doh:) - but all went well and I reloaded LMS' 93 Performance tune built for their 'severe' intake. Since then I've been rocking all through Mexico with nary a code or problem.

In the end, everyone I've dealt with at Livernois has been very responsive and helpful in every regard except the aforementioned thermostat temps. Almost makes me think there's a ton of history here that they are aware of, but that's just my take, who knows? I would of course like to scream at the shipping person that packaged the wrong intake!

The tune is friggin' awesome and does everything I hoped it would, so overall I'm very pleased. I might've liked a bit more sound from the intake, but it's a closed design so I guess I'll live with it. No difference in IAT versus stock. I just wish I would've went with a Reische 170, I don't see any complaints about them and the o-ring design alone would've saved me a huge pain in the ass.
Sponsored

 

Road Dog

Really Smart Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2015
Threads
18
Messages
871
Reaction score
388
Location
St Petersburg, FL
First Name
Carl
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Convertible
Nice writeup. Glad it worked out for you. Just curious though with you living in MD what kind of gains are you expecting from a lower temp thermostat?
 
OP
OP

Warmart

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Threads
1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT CO - Me; 2016 GT RR - Fiance
Nice writeup. Glad it worked out for you. Just curious though with you living in MD what kind of gains are you expecting from a lower temp thermostat?
Thank you, Road Dog. I was hoping for an approximately 10 degree temp reduction which is supposed to give slight performance gains. Additionally, the general consensus is a cooler engine (to a point of course) is overall better for longevity. This is one of those things that is argued and I'm no expert. I just think it was a waste to have the hassle with no change, although I can imagine the car's CHT measurement possibly shouldn't be regarded as the the gospel.
 

Agent_S550

Legend in his own mind
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Threads
18
Messages
852
Reaction score
340
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2016 Magnetic GT PP
Fluid temps and engine temps are crucial for the function of multiple parts. The only top side to lower CHT/ECT's are less detonation and the hopeful ability to run more timing. Unless a car is supercharged and producing excessive heat, I've never been one to praise the idea of installing a lower temperature thermostat.
 

Livernois Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Threads
226
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
955
Location
Dearborn Heights, Michigan
Website
www.livernoismotorsports.com
First Name
S550 HQ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT (TVS 2650) (6R80)
Hello Warmart, hope you're well.

Sorry it's taken a long time to chime in. Thanks for choosing us for your tune and modifications and for the honest feedback, we really value hearing about our customer experiences because we do always want to get better. Looking through your post lots of things didn't go as well as we would of liked but we're glad you're enjoying the tune.

I tried reflashing the tune, etc. The tech was responding to me well on Saturday and started to suspect that I was given the wrong CAI (with a more restrictive tube that didn't require a tune), and he mentioned that this has happened before. I took some pictures of the inside of the tube via the airbox and on Monday the tech confirmed that I had the wrong CAI. Ugh. For the time being I loaded another tune they had provided which was for a stock intake. I never got another CEL or dtc.

At this point I was pretty hot, sure it was a simple mistake but it shouldn't have happened.
We are so, so sorry about that, there is no excuse for sending the wrong parts out, it's very embarrassing to hear that we did.

In the end, everyone I've dealt with at Livernois has been very responsive and helpful in every regard except the aforementioned thermostat temps. Almost makes me think there's a ton of history here that they are aware of, but that's just my take, who knows? I would of course like to scream at the shipping person that packaged the wrong intake!
Thanks for that, it's great to hear that we were responsive despite the fact that we messed up with the wrong intake, again we apologize for that. If you do need anything from us or have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out to us. We want to make sure we are available for any questions or concerns.

With regards to the thermostat, I would be more than happy to give you some more information. The 160 thermostat is definitely cooler than stock. It has two main objectives, firstly to keep the block, especially around the combustion chambers cooler than the stock thermostat but also and just as importantly, to keep coolant temperatures steady regardless of how the vehicle is being driven, that's where the stock thermostat does a pretty bad job in all honesty.

Bear in mind, and you did make a reference to this, that the coolant temperature sensor is not reading the temperatures right inside the block around the combustion chambers so there is a little discrepancy as to what the temperatures really are where they matter the most. So it isn't really gospel, rather a ballpark figure.

The tune is friggin' awesome and does everything I hoped it would, so overall I'm very pleased.
Good to hear, thanks again for the feedback. We wished we could have done more to have made the experience much smoother. We will be looking at providing some documentation for the thermostat install and we'll look at what we can do to make the intake easier to install.

You did mention that you were looking for more noise, the Windstorm intake can connect to the sound resonator tube that routes to the firewall, one of our guys has a 16 GT with the same intake and he closed off that tube because the sound was too loud for him!

Also, on the subject of noise, to make amends for our mistakes, if you would like to get some more wonderful sound from the Mustang, please feel free to give us a call or send us a PM, we would be more than happy to offer you our Thunderstorm cat-back exhaust at our cost. :)

Cheers again!
 

Sponsored

18psi

of boost
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Threads
48
Messages
489
Reaction score
113
Location
Best Coast
Vehicle(s)
2021
I've a very simple/easy question for Livernois: does your mycal device allow any monitoring/logging? or is it just a flash device and nothing else?
 

Jay-rod427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Threads
29
Messages
2,422
Reaction score
1,011
Location
Kansas
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT C/S
I've a very simple/easy question for Livernois: does your mycal device allow any monitoring/logging? or is it just a flash device and nothing else?
Flashing only. For that reason, and that reason alone I chose not to go with Livernois. Not that I would pick apart the logs and complain about the tune, I just love seeing whats going on with the engine:)
 
OP
OP

Warmart

Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Threads
1
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT CO - Me; 2016 GT RR - Fiance
Hello Livernois,

No problem at all, your tech took over just fine and I've had no issues whatsoever. Hopefully the overall tone of my message was positive, in the end it wasn't a big deal and Livernois took care of me.

I have a somewhat unusual perspective in that I get to drive my wife's fully stock 16 GT fairly often. Lets just say it feels sick and sluggish and makes me miss mine! There's really no comparison and I again couldn't be any happier nor expect anything else from this tune.

I'm fine with the thermostat and my CHT's, not as low as I'd have liked but they do seem very steady. Additionally they are lower than my wife's, she sits around 210 during most driving (hers was about 5 degrees higher than mine from the start).

I'm almost 50, and I guess my hearing isn't so great as I kept the sound tube connected. I can definitely hear a growl versus the stock on my wife's but it's definitely not TOO loud. I'm not sure yet about an exhaust mod, I guess I'm one of the rare ones that isn't crazy about other's annoying exhausts. I will ponder that though, some definitely sound great. I appreciate the offer let me get back to you on it!

Cheers!
 

Terminator2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
448
Location
Spring Hill Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
Hello Livernois,

No problem at all, your tech took over just fine and I've had no issues whatsoever. Hopefully the overall tone of my message was positive, in the end it wasn't a big deal and Livernois took care of me.

I have a somewhat unusual perspective in that I get to drive my wife's fully stock 16 GT fairly often. Lets just say it feels sick and sluggish and makes me miss mine! There's really no comparison and I again couldn't be any happier nor expect anything else from this tune.

I'm fine with the thermostat and my CHT's, not as low as I'd have liked but they do seem very steady. Additionally they are lower than my wife's, she sits around 210 during most driving (hers was about 5 degrees higher than mine from the start).

I'm almost 50, and I guess my hearing isn't so great as I kept the sound tube connected. I can definitely hear a growl versus the stock on my wife's but it's definitely not TOO loud. I'm not sure yet about an exhaust mod, I guess I'm one of the rare ones that isn't crazy about other's annoying exhausts. I will ponder that though, some definitely sound great. I appreciate the offer let me get back to you on it!

Cheers!
That's funny my wife has a stock (other than mufflers) 16GT so I get the same perspective change when I drive hers. She has better gears in hers so back when mine was stock hers felt stronger but now it feels weak compared to mine especially at wide open throttle (my pedal tables are currently stock in my tune so my part throttle response about the same as it always was). She won't admit it but I can really gap her now. :D:lol:
 

Sasuketr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Threads
61
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
355
Location
Chicago,IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ingot Silver GTPP
Does the tune adjust fan settings as well?

The stock thermostat is rated 180 degree F and the stock fans kick in around 190-195 degree F if i remember right, so you have a 10 to 15 degree differential. During that time if the car is not moving and you release the coolant at 160 degrees, you are only providing water cooling to the engine, and when the coolant finishes it cycle back in the tank, it needs the heat to be taken off by the fans(forced convection) otherwise, the thermostat will resend the already warm coolant to the engine again and your efficiency will go down with each cycle till your cht's reach 190, 195 degree F where the fans kick in. Even then, the coolant temps might be still to high for the engine to cool down efficiently. This is on a stationary car ofcourse, if you move with on coming air you receive the fan effect.

Even with the 170 degree thermostat, if i reload the stock tune, my cht's always get high, maybe 5 degrees lower than stock 180 thermostat but still around 210-215 degree F in a hot summer day 90+ degree F.
 

Sponsored

JJAMARA

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2016
Threads
3
Messages
55
Reaction score
9
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT triple yellow
I've a very simple/easy question for Livernois: does your mycal device allow any monitoring/logging? or is it just a flash device and nothing else?

Why would you need data logging. You paid for a tune that's dyno proven. Your gtg I would be pissed if I paid to get my car tune and then oh btw you need to log it to make sure it good. What did I pay for then if I'm data logging. But to each is own. Lol
 

18psi

of boost
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Threads
48
Messages
489
Reaction score
113
Location
Best Coast
Vehicle(s)
2021
Why would you need data logging. You paid for a tune that's dyno proven. Your gtg I would be pissed if I paid to get my car tune and then oh btw you need to log it to make sure it good. What did I pay for then if I'm data logging. But to each is own. Lol
I'm not sure if you're joking or really that dense.
 

Terminator2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
1,960
Reaction score
448
Location
Spring Hill Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium
Why would you need data logging. You paid for a tune that's dyno proven. Your gtg I would be pissed if I paid to get my car tune and then oh btw you need to log it to make sure it good. What did I pay for then if I'm data logging. But to each is own. Lol
Because no two cars are identical. Mostly to ensure everything looks normal. Data logs are a powerful diagnostic tool for example the OP got the wrong file for his MAF size it would have been easy to tell right away via a data log showing LTFT and STFT vs MAF.
 

4V Mayhem

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2016
Threads
9
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
529
Location
US
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Premium M6
Sooo...about this free exhaust...I mean, if OP doesn't want it, then maybe you could send it to me...??!!
Sponsored

 
 








Top