dev1360
Well-Known Member
Is there an actual benefit to having a significantly lower CHT?
I come from the LS world where low temp thermostats are popular, but actually hinder power.
I asked my tuner for my Vette (DSteck) about it and he had done a lot of testing with them on his own car and lost as much as 20whp with the lower temp thermostats. The stock 195* thermostat consistently made the most power.
On one hand I understand where a lower CHT would allow for more timing. On the other hand, a warmer CHT allows for more complete combustion with the warmer cylinder.
Obviously, coyote=/=LS, but I'd just like to see an identifiable gain (in anything, not necessarily power), instead of following broscience dogma.
I come from the LS world where low temp thermostats are popular, but actually hinder power.
I asked my tuner for my Vette (DSteck) about it and he had done a lot of testing with them on his own car and lost as much as 20whp with the lower temp thermostats. The stock 195* thermostat consistently made the most power.
On one hand I understand where a lower CHT would allow for more timing. On the other hand, a warmer CHT allows for more complete combustion with the warmer cylinder.
Obviously, coyote=/=LS, but I'd just like to see an identifiable gain (in anything, not necessarily power), instead of following broscience dogma.
Sponsored