68fbjjz109
Well-Known Member
I don't know what your trying to prove.Naked 6th Gen structure vs. the S550:
http://www.autosteel.org/~/media/Files/Autosteel/Great Designs in Steel/GDIS 2014/Shawn Morgans.pdf
Notice the S550 behind the B Pillar? Tank...
Go back and examine the area behind the Camaro's B-Pillar. Hell, even the ATS Coupe has metal there. This area should not be missing or, be capable or simply unbolting a few screws.
As I stated long ago, the Camaro potentially required intrusion beams behind the B-pillar :(
I haven't seen a fully sectioned Alpha Camaro, I also don't know if only the body side outer is missing in the catalog picture. However there is not additional bolt in structure. And there is nothing wrong with it. Bolt in structure is used all the time due to assembly constraints or tailored cost.
The Mustang has two bolt in shock tower braces once of which, the yields a 10% torsional improvement IIRC.
However you have to keep in mind material selection, and architectural differences, as they internalize and integrate much more structure specifically in the C ring and parcel tray.
It's different, doesn't mean it is wrong.
There is alot of other stuff going on.
Look at how short the cross section of the mustang engine bay rails, look at the lack of form or the harsh transitions, the lack of cross car engine firewall structure, and the BOLT IN hinge pillar to engine bay rail reinforcement plates (not pictured). Mustang might be a flimsy turd up front... Though it sure wins the fuck out of races.
Sponsored
Last edited: