Sponsored

Which CAI will it be??

EcoSwag1990

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Threads
60
Messages
3,278
Reaction score
910
Location
West Chester, PA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Triple Yellow GT
Hey guys, just wanted to get everyone's thoughts on which cold air intake they'll be going with and why??? I'm fairly new to the aftermarket and there are several options now so I feel like I don't have enough experience with these intakes to choose on over the other.

So far I've seen one from:

C&L = $400
http://www.americanmuscle.com/cnl-cai-2015eco.html


Airaid = $400
http://www.americanmuscle.com/airaid-synthamax-cai-15eco.html

MMR = $200
http://www.modularmotorsportsracing.com/

Video with MMR CAI:
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1554523414782497&set=vb.1448716368696536&type=2&theater


JLT has one for the GT so I'll throw that in too =$350
http://www.americanmuscle.com/jlt-cold-air-intake-2015gt.html

I'm leaning towards the one from MMR for now because it is significantly cheaper and looks/sounds pretty good, but is there a reason why it is cheaper?:headbonk:
Sponsored

 

Five Oh Brian

Mustang Guru
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
462
Location
Pacific NW
Website
www.KorumFord.com
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
11 GT500 Glass Roof Coupe
CAI's are just eye candy; there are no meaningful power gains to be had with them. It's the tuning that yields all the power gains. So, choose the CAI that you thinks looks coolest with the hood up.
 

DanFish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Threads
16
Messages
678
Reaction score
71
Location
Arizona
First Name
Dante
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ruby Red GT, 2015 Black Eco
I'm going with MMR because you can't beat that price and I know that they do quality work.
 

oyitsagreen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2014
Threads
4
Messages
525
Reaction score
5
Location
Charlotte
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
I have no idea if ill even spring for a CAI this time. If I were to get one itd be between either JLT or Airaid.


JLT because I've has good experiences with them in the past.



Airaid because the closed box setup looks interesting.


My thoughts right now are more focused on an exhaust , suspension and a tune :D

Sent from my RM-877_nam_att_205 using Tapatalk
 

Grimace427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Threads
14
Messages
6,467
Reaction score
1,702
Location
NoVA
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang 5.0
Skip the CAI, get a tune and exhaust first for the most 'smiles-for-the-buck'. After that depending on your preference get a sorted suspension setup and wheels/tires.
 

Sponsored

Wildcat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Threads
18
Messages
655
Reaction score
20
Location
Tampa, FL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Focus
I'm probably biased, but I have an Airaid intake in my 07, and the quality is absolutely superb and it fit like a glove. Airaid made the Roush branded CAIs for the earlier S550s (which Roush promptly sold for more money despite being the exact same intake).

Also installed an Airaid intake on my dad's Charger SRT; it was also excellent fit and finish wise.

The new one looks pretty cool with the closed top. I'd grab one of those and a tuner in the kit from AM.
 

2wheels4me

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 20, 2014
Threads
2
Messages
508
Reaction score
113
Location
SoCal
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
GTPP, Much-Modded Fiat 500 Sport, 911 Carrera S
This ^^^^^
 

Sales@BBR

Sales & Tech
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Threads
32
Messages
224
Reaction score
5
Location
Boca Raton, FL
Website
www.blowbyracing.com
Vehicle(s)
BlowByRacing
Both airaid and JLT use a composite plastic tubing so saying one is more then the other is wrong. Both will heatsoak with the motor running. Theirs no way around that. The difference is the flow. With any system (even on blowers or tubro's) you want the least amount of distance with the straightest shot of air which will net the power.

We have had great success with the JLT producing over 30rwhp with just a tune. I recommend them to anyone. You can feel the gains in the mid range as well as up top over the stop air box and its smaller MAF housing (which is the key to making power)
 

TWilliams

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Threads
1
Messages
204
Reaction score
13
Location
Wherever my car takes me
Vehicle(s)
2015 Ruby Red GT Premium
I would naturally expect that increases in HP and Tq would come at a cost in MPG. Anyone have a feel for what the reported gains in performance would cost in terms of your fuel mileage?

Say using the Bama tune reported figures: 93 Bama Tune w/JLT Intake RWHP/RWTQ: 412/382.

I'm not a track guy, and I've never modded before, but might consider this for gains in low-mid range torque.
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

EcoSwag1990

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Threads
60
Messages
3,278
Reaction score
910
Location
West Chester, PA
Vehicle(s)
2016 Triple Yellow GT
I would naturally expect that increases in HP and Tq would come at a cost in MPG. Anyone have a feel for what the reported gains in performance would cost in terms of your fuel mileage?

Say using the Bama tune reported figures: 93 Bama Tune w/JLT Intake RWHP/RWTQ: 412/382.

I'm not a track guy, and I've never modded before, but might consider this for gains in low-mid range torque.
Thanks for all the feedback guys, always good info here. I am interested in TWilliams' question also. I actually already have the Ford Racing sport cat back sitting in my living room waiting to be mounted up and I wonder whether MPG will see any real noticible benefit from the combo of CAI and cat back increasing airflow. Would make for a nice excuse for the addition spending :)
 

IndustryLeech

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Threads
18
Messages
1,038
Reaction score
202
Location
Eugene, OR
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP, 2012 V6 'vert, '70 VW Bug, '01 Disco 2
I would naturally expect that increases in HP and Tq would come at a cost in MPG. Anyone have a feel for what the reported gains in performance would cost in terms of your fuel mileage?

Say using the Bama tune reported figures: 93 Bama Tune w/JLT Intake RWHP/RWTQ: 412/382.

I'm not a track guy, and I've never modded before, but might consider this for gains in low-mid range torque.
I can only report my personal experience about a tune on my 2012 V6. I got noticable, but not significant HP and throttle response gains with a 92 octane tune, but I did notice around 1 to 2 MPG consistent gain with it. I was putting 92 octane in the car before the tune so it wasn't because I was putting better fuel in my car.
 

Shepherd

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2014
Threads
0
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
JLT intake and tune from DTP. Why? Results, Reputation, and looks!
Sponsored

 
 








Top