Track mode on base GT

[jimijammer]

I can understand that...Its just that the premium has exactly the options i wanted along with the radio...toggles leather among other things...I always opt for the best audio systems factory. It was a very easy selection. no need for reverse sensing, Nav, adaptive cruise control or rain sensing wipers, 50th appearance or even the premium trim. I like functional practicality along with luxury & handling suited for an Audi sport coupe

I tried optioning out a 2015 F150 with the options that I preferred but with some trims snd my own taste of finishes just did not match at all! My head is still spinning from the options packages

It was 1000x harder to pick the trim line as it was to just select the FX4 model as when I ordered it even with base options similar to my truck... the cost was still way over 13g when my truck had an msrp of 39k...

You, also, are making my point. The F150 has so many trim levels for basically the same truck you can get just about any combination you want if you are willing to sift through them. Some people want the simplicity of just picking a trim level and some need a few specific things. Why then is the Mustang so limited in the trim choices? I am sure that will expand in a year or two to accommodate these frustrations, and I realize they had to stop somewhere with the design, but I'm committed to this purchase and don't want to feel the need to trade up to 2nd or 3rd model year changes...like for a 8 speed auto trans...etc. I don't usually rant this way, just good-nature discussion I hope.

Sponsored

 

[TheRican]

Why not put the track mode on the performance package? The damn thing is probably already sitting there in the ecu, just needs to be "unlocked " with the premium trim. Who tracks the premium model? These seem to be two opposing forces at work here

 

[Wolfman625]

Wow so much hate on one another. To the person that said us base gt owners just want more hand outs on a base car that we can't afford the options is a joke. For me for example the base had all the things I care for and many that I was surprised it came with. For a base car it is very loaded. The small weight matterd for me for the track. Eavry lb counts. And for saying we are jealous of options we can't afford is just ignorant. I paid cash for my Base GT. I've had it for almost a month now and love it and don't regret anything. If I wanted the premium I could of easily got it. Or a LE# for that matter.
I do agree that it is sad that the modes are not all available on the base but oh well. Dose have a sport mode thst lights up on dash by hitting Trac 2 times. But Idk abouts throttle for sure. Sorry bit had to get that off my chest.

 

[Seabee1973]

You, also, are making my point. The F150 has so many trim levels for basically the same truck you can get just about any combination you want if you are willing to sift through them. Some people want the simplicity of just picking a trim level and some need a few specific things. Why then is the Mustang so limited in the trim choices? I am sure that will expand in a year or two to accommodate these frustrations, and I realize they had to stop somewhere with the design, but I'm committed to this purchase and don't want to feel the need to trade up to 2nd or 3rd model year changes...like for a 8 speed auto trans...etc. I don't usually rant this way, just good-nature discussion I hope.

That's where you are wrong.... Some of the packages that are on the f150 that you want,,, when you select another package it overrides the original... like an upsell as brent stated.... Some packages such as infotainment screens are only available having a lariat, king ranch or a platinum which is top of the line.... however if you wanted a certain package you would have to have the trimline lariat on up..... before there were infotainment screens and sync.... the trim line was for the top end, FX4, Lariat, king ranch, and the lmtd Harley Davidson.... now..... packages are xlt, lariat, king ranch and platinum.... the FX4 package is merely an off road package....... certain bed sizes were eliminated on trims... personally I like supercab with a 5.5 bed....that is not available unless you get a 6ft bed with supercab... you are forced to get the super crew to get the 5.5 bed... which makes the truck lose it's sporty image.... too hard to explain all details as it is very complicated. Personally... ford did right with their packages... it was reasonable with what you gpt for each of the packages.... also may I add that a ton of the options in a 2014 model were made standard on the 2015 such as mycolor, doorsills, rearview camera, the upgraded 4 piston brakes... if you added up the cost on those options... it surpasses the cost on upgrading to a premium... you just have to look at the big picture of those options and consider that a ton of people bitched because they wanted more and more and more as standard/included options...that opened the door for the simplistic options we now have for the mustang... you know the rest

 

[jimijammer]

That's where you are wrong.... Some of the packages that are on the f150 that you want,,, when you select another package it overrides the original... like an upsell as brent stated.... Some packages such as infotainment screens are only available having a lariat, king ranch or a platinum which is top of the line.... however if you wanted a certain package you would have to have the trimline lariat on up..... before there were infotainment screens and sync.... the trim line was for the top end, FX4, Lariat, king ranch, and the lmtd Harley Davidson.... now..... packages are xlt, lariat, king ranch and platinum.... the FX4 package is merely an off road package....... certain bed sizes were eliminated on trims... personally I like supercab with a 5.5 bed....that is not available unless you get a 6ft bed with supercab... you are forced to get the super crew to get the 5.5 bed... which makes the truck lose it's sporty image.... too hard to explain all details as it is very complicated. Personally... ford did right with their packages... it was reasonable with what you gpt for each of the packages.... also may I add that a ton of the options in a 2014 model were made standard on the 2015 such as mycolor, doorsills, rearview camera, the upgraded 4 piston brakes... if you added up the cost on those options... it surpasses the cost on upgrading to a premium... you just have to look at the big picture of those options and consider that a ton of people bitched because they wanted more and more and more as standard/included options...that opened the door for the simplistic options we now have for the mustang... you know the rest

Good explanation, really I only knew there was a lot of trim levels for the F150 that confused the choices and I agree that the base 2015 Mustang is miles ahead of my 2011 base V6 and I'm happy with that.
Just wish the choices were not so combined. Thanks for the info. Besides I have no problem with top of the line, we have all the bells & whistles on our other vehicle, just wanted to be selective on this spirited daily commuter.

 

[2015 drof]

Wow so much hate on one another. To the person that said us base gt owners just want more hand outs on a base car that we can't afford the options is a joke. For me for example the base had all the things I care for and many that I was surprised it came with. For a base car it is very loaded. The small weight matterd for me for the track. Eavry lb counts. And for saying we are jealous of options we can't afford is just ignorant. I paid cash for my Base GT. I've had it for almost a month now and love it and don't regret anything. If I wanted the premium I could of easily got it. Or a LE# for that matter.
I do agree that it is sad that the modes are not all available on the base but oh well. Dose have a sport mode thst lights up on dash by hitting Trac 2 times. But Idk abouts throttle for sure. Sorry bit had to get that off my chest.

Well said Wolfman625! Those statements are ones that divide the forums. Not everyone wants leather seats that are going to dry out and crack in 5 years time or a navigation system or for that matter lights that illuminate the ground in the shape of a pony. The heart of this machine resides in the Base GT. This is my first Mustang and I'm proud to have ordered the Base GT. First world issues right? To each their own. I say good for the premium owners and good for all mustang owners.

 

[Supa LA]

Why the hell are people talking about F-150s? Or trucks period?

This all comes down to one argument. Why make a performance package and not feature a track mode? How ridiculous is that to grasp? Majority of the people who buy the premium are going to be granny shifting around, sunday driving, and no track days. NOW, take the guy (me for example) who doesn't need or want a premium model, but wishes for the best performance possible out of their vehicle so they order a base with perf pack. It has bigger brakes, better suspension etc. Now, doesn't that sound like it's designed around the idea that said owner will/ may actually use those features? Like say, at a TRACK? It just blows my mind. Sure I get it, but it most certainly doesn't make it right. If I'm spending X amt of money on a 5.0 (or any mustang) it's because o want the vehicle for its power, look and performance. Not leather heated/cooled seats and a nav system. Ugh.

 

[Brent302]

Well said Wolfman625! Those statements are ones that divide the forums. Not everyone wants leather seats that are going to dry out and crack in 5 years time or a navigation system or for that matter lights that illuminate the ground in the shape of a pony. The heart of this machine resides in the Base GT. This is my first Mustang and I'm proud to have ordered the Base GT. First world issues right? To each their own. I say good for the premium owners and good for all mustang owners.

Then you make false negative statements towards a premium owners options...sure guy lol. If you keep up proper maintenance once a month. even once a year your leather isn't going to dry out and crack..

But hey its those statements that divide the forums.....see what I did there...

 

[2015 drof]

Why the hell are people talking about F-150s? Or trucks period?

This all comes down to one argument. Why make a performance package and not feature a track mode? How ridiculous is that to grasp? Majority of the people who buy the premium are going to be granny shifting around, sunday driving, and no track days. NOW, take the guy (me for example) who doesn't need or want a premium model, but wishes for the best performance possible out of their vehicle so they order a base with perf pack. It has bigger brakes, better suspension etc. Now, doesn't that sound like it's designed around the idea that said owner will/ may actually use those features? Like say, at a TRACK? It just blows my mind. Sure I get it, but it most certainly doesn't make it right. If I'm spending X amt of money on a 5.0 (or any mustang) it's because o want the vehicle for its power, look and performance. Not leather heated/cooled seats and a nav system. Ugh.

You said it spot on! Well said.

 

[Seabee1973]

Why not put the track mode on the performance package? The damn thing is probably already sitting there in the ecu, just needs to be "unlocked " with the premium trim. Who tracks the premium model? These seem to be two opposing forces at work here

Who actually tracks their car after spending nearly 40g on it and the purpose of it is for their daily or pleasure? No one ever said you cant use track mode on the streets. I would say over 80% of those that are buying the new mustang is not for the purpose of tracking... maybe a couple fun events here n there but the majority is for their liesure or DD. there are those that just get it for bragging rights whether you know how to drive it or not

 

[Seabee1973]

Why the hell are people talking about F-150s? Or trucks period?

This all comes down to one argument. Why make a performance package and not feature a track mode? How ridiculous is that to grasp? Majority of the people who buy the premium are going to be granny shifting around, sunday driving, and no track days. NOW, take the guy (me for example) who doesn't need or want a premium model, but wishes for the best performance possible out of their vehicle so they order a base with perf pack. It has bigger brakes, better suspension etc. Now, doesn't that sound like it's designed around the idea that said owner will/ may actually use those features? Like say, at a TRACK? It just blows my mind. Sure I get it, but it most certainly doesn't make it right. If I'm spending X amt of money on a 5.0 (or any mustang) it's because o want the vehicle for its power, look and performance. Not leather heated/cooled seats and a nav system. Ugh.

The point was to explain some of the packaging and comparison between the two.....What started was trying to help explain what is included which evolved to griping how come it is not included......Done with it....spend your money as you see fit....The whole thing basically shows what you are willing to pay for what you want... Its not intended as a bashing for anyones money.... Its your money... If you regret what you ordered later is your problem.... I tried to explain but it obviously went nowhere Good luck to you guys.....I will enjoy my Mustang exactly the way I ordered it knowing what comes with it:ford:

 

[TheRican]

Who actually tracks their car after spending nearly 40g on it and the purpose of it is for their daily or pleasure? No one ever said you cant use track mode on the streets. I would say over 80% of those that are buying the new mustang is not for the purpose of tracking... maybe a couple fun events here n there but the majority is for their liesure or DD. there are those that just get it for bragging rights whether you know how to drive it or not

A lot of people? I souls reckon a good portion take their cars to track days, etc, because why spend the damn money then?

The track feature should have come with the PP.. End of story

 

[robb]

I agree with Rican. If the car has the PP/Track Package it should have track mode. It's possible the base GT with PP in sport+ mode is the same as track mode and Ford simply doesn't want to reveal it. I'm sure it will be fine on the track, that'll I'll only go to once a year anyway.

 

[billy the k]

NOW, take the guy (me for example) who doesn't need or want a premium model, but wishes for the best performance possible out of their vehicle so they order a base with perf pack. It has bigger brakes, better suspension etc. Now, doesn't that sound like it's designed around the idea that said owner will/ may actually use those features? Like say, at a TRACK?...If I'm spending X amt of money on a 5.0 (or any mustang) it's because I want the vehicle for its power, look and performance. Not leather heated/cooled seats and a nav system. Ugh.

Pretty much represents my thinking on the subject...

On Order [July 15, 2014]:

2015 [300A—"base"] GT/Ingot Silver
6spd MT
Performance Package
Recaros
Reverse Sensing

 

[BmacIL]

I haven't tried it on a GT, but on an EB I drove, Sport+ gave the throttle response I would expect for a performance car. I don't think you'll be disappointed with that on the base GT, nor will I.

Sponsored