The ECU for the dampening system is a dedicated module. Any other information related to buffering, I/O performance and transfer of information to other onboard systems can be directed to a secondary chipset dedicated to activity monitoring. But, definitely nothing to cause latency that would drop the response times between the ECU and the dampers. Its basically either on of off with different levels of signal strength. So simple its brilliant. No actual moving mechanical parts to break. And not internet... More like a direct conduit. That would be the better decription. Latency is not relevant. In fact the response is almost instantaneous. No layer 3 obstacles, no routing, no relays.
A parallel for the perceived experience would be an audiophile or a videophile. Yes the transitions are well beyond our level of sensory perception, But with experience comes the ability to know that an experience we actually find tangible is better than where it was before the advancements came.
Driving the same track knowing where it will provide feedback that is too soft or too hard and then doing it again in this new system and finding the areas we have been accustomed to feeling a certain way is no longer applicable. That's quantifiable.
A parallel for the perceived experience would be an audiophile or a videophile. Yes the transitions are well beyond our level of sensory perception, But with experience comes the ability to know that an experience we actually find tangible is better than where it was before the advancements came.
Driving the same track knowing where it will provide feedback that is too soft or too hard and then doing it again in this new system and finding the areas we have been accustomed to feeling a certain way is no longer applicable. That's quantifiable.
Sponsored
