Stripped Down "Poverty Specs"

[Chameleon]

Thanks Murphy.

Sponsored

 

[magnetic5oh]

A clone! :cheers:

Indeed Was worth the wait for the factory order.

 

[thehunterooo]

Indeed Was worth the wait for the factory order.

Got that right!

 

[EcoSwag1990]

$32,500 for the Base, totally minimalist. Only option was floormats. weighed in at 3575 with a 1/4 tank at the Texas SCCA Solo Champ

Ok so either this guy ^ used a crappy scale to weigh his car or Ford (and BMR) were off by over 100lbs when they weighed the GT

 

[Chameleon]

Ok so either this guy ^ used a crappy scale to weigh his car or Ford (and BMR) were off by over 100lbs when they weighed the GT

Back for more I see. Ford and BMR are quoting the GT WITH the performance pack. Which adds weight. Move along you look more and more foolish.

 

[Asharus]

LOL

 

[EcoSwag1990]

A. Ford and BMR were both weighing non PP cars
B. Even IF that were true, that would be to say that the PP adds over 130lbs

 

[Chameleon]

Now spewing bad info over respected members.


2015 Mustang GT Performance Pack 300A - MT82 Transmission
Curb Weight (scaled at BMR) - 3736lbs
Front Unsprung Weight: 143.9lbs per side
Rear Unsprung Weight: 132lbs per side

 

[EcoSwag1990]

I'll just throw a couple links in here for ppl who don't want false info.

I can see why you cling to this so hard because it's the only real benefit you can come up with for a base model

http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/...est-specs.html
http://www.mustang6g.com/mustangwiki/doku.php

 

[Chameleon]

Take this as a lesson. LOL

 

[Moderator]

Cleaned up the thread, guys enough with the insults against each other. If this can't be debated while keeping it civil, the thread will be closed.

 

[murphyslaww]

Ok so either this guy ^ used a crappy scale to weigh his car or Ford (and BMR) were off by over 100lbs when they weighed the GT

So, I'm guessing you are a troll, or just not very bright. I'm in a class in scca that requires a weight to be taken. They are high dollar corner weighting scales as are Vorshlag's, which did my initial weight at 3593.

I'm going to be wrong several times today, tomorrow, and the.next day. It never ceases to amaze me when people can't accept that in themselves.

 

[EcoSwag1990]

So you are saying you trust that this scale is more accurate than the official weight numbers that were released by ford to all publications and that show up in a simple google search. Why would ford not want the car to weigh over 100lbs less?

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=2015+mustang+gt+weight

 

[gtlaw]

I'll just throw a couple links in here for ppl who don't want false info.

I can see why you cling to this so hard because it's the only real benefit you can come up with for a base model

http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/...est-specs.html
http://www.mustang6g.com/mustangwiki/doku.php

not wanting leather and saving $$$$ are the best reasons for base

 

[Grintch]

Not sure performance package, recaro seats and reverse sensing even qualifies as minimalist

You get a reverse camera standard, so I see no need for the reverse sensors.

I have a buddy with a Premium GT PP + Recaros, I much prefer my GT PP + $6000.

Sponsored