Honestly, I think 22mpg is not so bad for this kind of car.Tank 2 w/93oct: 322.5mi @ 14.7 gallons= 21.9mpg this was me really trying for fuel economy, no WOT runs nothing! Shifting 1-4-6 majority of the time, 70/30 mix between highway and "city". I am a bit disappointed in those numbers as I thought they would be better than my first tank which included test drives and a few WOT runs here and there, and it still came out to be the same at the end. What seems to really kill MPG are start ups and driving short distances. Before I filled up the computer was sitting at 24mpg, but I ran a few errands around town during my lunch break at work and by the time i got back the computer was reading 22mpg.
NOTE: I am NOT disappointed with the number in compression to the performance of the car just to what the first tank netted me with some "fun" driving thrown in.
Performance pack on your car?Tank 2 w/93oct: 322.5mi @ 14.7 gallons= 21.9mpg this was me really trying for fuel economy, no WOT runs nothing! Shifting 1-4-6 majority of the time, 70/30 mix between highway and "city". I am a bit disappointed in those numbers as I thought they would be better than my first tank which included test drives and a few WOT runs here and there, and it still came out to be the same at the end. What seems to really kill MPG are start ups and driving short distances. Before I filled up the computer was sitting at 24mpg, but I ran a few errands around town during my lunch break at work and by the time i got back the computer was reading 22mpg.
NOTE: I am NOT disappointed with the number in compression to the performance of the car just to what the first tank netted me with some "fun" driving thrown in.
No, not bad at all. I came from a Mazda Speed 3 that was rated at 18/25 city/hwy and I was pulling 27mpg with the same route, granted I only have 700mi on the car, but I thought for sure I would get 23-24mpg avg on this last tank. This is with 3.55 gears staying at 60mph on the highway.Honestly, I think 22mpg is not so bad for this kind of car.
Looks like nonPP 6M 3.55'sPerformance pack on your car?
Which is what I was hoping for.Others have posted 24-25 mpg avg with 3.55 gears so I figured anything down near 21-22 would be with 3.73. My commute is 80% highway so I would expect at around 25 mpg avg at 70 mph with 3.31 gears.
Yeah. I'm not expecting great mpg out of a 5.0L performance car, but I am expecting it to get near the EPA highway number if driven reasonably (most N/A engines do) as a daily driver.Which is what I was hoping for.
Do we know when they switch to "winter" and "summer" gas? How about quality gas stations? I usually try to fill up at Shell, when I filled up yesterday I used Sunoco.MPG:
If your car is well tuned to optimize efficiency, the higher fuel energy content, the better mpg you should get.
Here are some energy content values:
Base gasoline: 114K BTU/gallon
Summer gasoline: 114.5K BTU/gal
Winter gasoline: 112.5K BTU/gal
10% MBTE ('oxygenated gasohol'): 112K BTU/gal
E85 Ethanol: 81.8K BTU/gal
E100 Ethanol: 56.8K BTU/gal
Diesel: 129.5K BTU/gal
Average Bio-Diesel: about 120K BTU/gal
So the higher the BTU rating the better MPG you should expect. Of course, other factors are involved including engine efficiency/transmission efficiency/gearing/wheel efficiency/oil viscosity and ambient temperature (Summer/Winter) and driving habits.
My 2014 Flex-Fuel truck yields MPG values close to the percentage comparisons (about 20-30% decrease when I switched from summer gas to E85)
So I check the price versus energy rating to determine my best mpg per dollar. In my home town E85 is about 10% more expensive than summer gas. So there is no way I am going to fill with E85 and take a 30-35% price increase per mile.
Do we know when they switch to "winter" and "summer" gas? How about quality gas stations? I usually try to fill up at Shell, when I filled up yesterday I used Sunoco.