Sponsored

Performance Pack suspension bouncy?

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
At speeds of <60 mph, I did not find the PP GT to be bouncy. I believe it is mostly at higher speeds which makes the same size road input a higher impulse (faster input but same displacement). This again points to a front /rear match issue as Norm correctly stated. The time between the bump hitting the front wheels to the back wheels decreases and in order for the chassis to settle and not overshoot (bounce), the front to rear ride frequencies have to be matched. From my race car engineering days, I remember the rear ride frequency needed to be 1.1-1.3 times the front, depending on wheelbase, weight distribution and desired control speed.
Sponsored

 

Rv-Junke

Rv-Junke
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Threads
27
Messages
698
Reaction score
170
Location
New Jersey
First Name
Fred
Vehicle(s)
2021 Black GT - PP
I rather doubt that the PP shocks and/or struts are position-sensitive (damping that varies with ride height as well as with its piston speed - think "suspension speed", relatively slow in roll, squat, and brake dive but much faster when you hit a sharp bump).

What adding weight at just the rear does is slow down the rear suspension's natural frequency, and having the front and rear suspension frequencies in the proper relationship to each other does affect ride quality. Poorly chosen, it might feel like you're riding in an old pickup truck with nothing in the bed, were you get a lot of nose-up/tail-down and vice versa motion of the truck as a whole and front-to-back head-toss for you in particular.

If only the rear shocks aren't up to snuff you won't get as much head toss, but the rear suspension may feel like it'll never stop moving even though the front feels 'settled'. Anybody who has ever changed only the front shocks on a car knows how this feels.

This could be a little of both . . .


Norm
Thanks Norm...So in essence the suspension as a whole maybe off.
 

leszek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
456
Reaction score
148
Location
Kirkland, WA
Vehicle(s)
S550 CO GT PP vert
Has anyone tried the Viking rear shocks with a soft compression and hard rebound settings? I bet that would fix the bounciness quickly.
 

Hack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
86
Messages
12,801
Reaction score
8,209
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Mustang, Challenger
If weight in the rear helps to reduce the problem you are having, then you want softer and less sporty suspension. I can see where coming from more cushy cars the Mustang suspension setup could be irritating especially if you don't do performance driving. It's less relaxing riding in a car with sportier and stiffer suspension.

To me the car is extremely soft and compliant, but I have a base (non PP) GT, and I'm coming from the SRA 2011 GT with the Brembos/track pack and stiffer suspension. That car was uncomfortable some times, especially when our roads got rough in the middle of winter. -20 degree weather really opens up the expansion joints.

It's like when I drive around in my F250 plow truck - you feel every bump in the road. But if I have 500-600 lbs of weight in the back it rides great. Nice and cushy. That's because the springs are stiff in order to be able to haul large loads. For the Mustang it's the same, but the springs are somewhat stiff in order to control the body well over discontinuities in the road. It's funny because to me the springs on my 2015 GT seem really soft to me, but it all depends on what you are used to.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
4,652
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
If weight in the rear helps to reduce the problem you are having, then you want softer and less sporty suspension.
It's more complicated than "softer and less sporty". Especially when you try to optimize the compromises among several somewhat contradictory requirements and aren't going to discard any of the 'sport'. Pitch motion and flat ride considerations are but one aspect.


Norm
 

Sponsored

Rv-Junke

Rv-Junke
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Threads
27
Messages
698
Reaction score
170
Location
New Jersey
First Name
Fred
Vehicle(s)
2021 Black GT - PP
If weight in the rear helps to reduce the problem you are having, then you want softer and less sporty suspension. I can see where coming from more cushy cars the Mustang suspension setup could be irritating especially if you don't do performance driving. It's less relaxing riding in a car with sportier and stiffer suspension.

To me the car is extremely soft and compliant, but I have a base (non PP) GT, and I'm coming from the SRA 2011 GT with the Brembos/track pack and stiffer suspension. That car was uncomfortable some times, especially when our roads got rough in the middle of winter. -20 degree weather really opens up the expansion joints.

It's like when I drive around in my F250 plow truck - you feel every bump in the road. But if I have 500-600 lbs of weight in the back it rides great. Nice and cushy. That's because the springs are stiff in order to be able to haul large loads. For the Mustang it's the same, but the springs are somewhat stiff in order to control the body well over discontinuities in the road. It's funny because to me the springs on my 2015 GT seem really soft to me, but it all depends on what you are used to.
Just to level set...

My DD is a 2012 Raptor with Fox 3.0, not exactly Cushy
My Sunny day car is a 2014 GT500, not exactly Cushy
My Family car is a 2011 Mercedes S550, DEFINITLY Cushy

So just on the cars I am currently driving I know Stiff/Sporty, Cushy/Plush, and BOUNCY which is what the PP in the 2015 Mustang is...This is 100% problem with compatibility with the early compression of the springs to dampeners (shocks).
 

dhardison

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Threads
17
Messages
154
Reaction score
41
Location
Delaware, OH
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Since I haven't had the time to install my Steeda progressive springs I thought I'd try a quick little test. I measured from the ground to the topmost rear wheel opening with no weight in the trunk. Then I put 160# in the trunk (barbell weights, 2 45# & 2 35#) and measured again.

Interestingly it was only a 3/8" drop, but MAN what a HUGE difference in the ride quality! The bounciness is gone and the car now rides like it should, well except for those pesky weights sliding around in the trunk..... :)
 
OP
OP

Hase

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2015
Threads
4
Messages
49
Reaction score
20
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
15 Guard GT Performance Package
Just to level set...

My DD is a 2012 Raptor with Fox 3.0, not exactly Cushy
My Sunny day car is a 2014 GT500, not exactly Cushy
My Family car is a 2011 Mercedes S550, DEFINITLY Cushy

So just on the cars I am currently driving I know Stiff/Sporty, Cushy/Plush, and BOUNCY which is what the PP in the 2015 Mustang is...This is 100% problem with compatibility with the early compression of the springs to dampeners (shocks).
So if you really think this is the case, I am wondering if the adjustable warrior shocks could be a potential solution. http://www.mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23530
 

Falconeddie

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Threads
6
Messages
28
Reaction score
3
Location
alaska
Vehicle(s)
GTP DIBM Auto 20"
Not true my friend. I have a 2006 Mustang GT premium and it rides way better than my 2015 GT premium. Ford has some work to do on its new independent suspension tuning.
 

Rags828

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Threads
0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Location
TN
Vehicle(s)
'15 GT non-PP
When I think of the word "bouncy" a secondary motion is implied -- I hope that's not what the consensus is here -- I didn't feel any of that on my test drive. I felt the bumps and joints in the road surface, but I never felt each one more than once, if that makes sense...
Yes, I've had quite the time of trying to figure out how to describe my ride quality.

I'm thinking floaty is more of what I'm talking about. It's like when I go over a bump (not even a harsh one), the rebound or extension of the shocks/springs travels way too much. And then the rates catch up and the bump bring it back down. All of which feels like it's going to throw me out of my seat.

I'm after a more planted feel and would be very happy with a firmer setup. I'm going to look at some Steeda and FR components to hopefully resolve.
 

Sponsored

hiccup

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 27, 2015
Threads
51
Messages
1,407
Reaction score
285
Location
Kentucky
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT black base PP RECAROS
Freshly paved roads seem to be the only chance I get at a very smooth ride. I've always felt that the bouncing was caused by the rear suspension shocks not being compatible with the factory pp rear springs ... Hope my koni str.t's correct this should I ever get the chance to install them.
 

VinnAY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Threads
16
Messages
1,426
Reaction score
360
Location
Kansas City
Vehicle(s)
18 Camaro 1SS/1LE
I have just one small stretch of road that has some aspect to it that I get the bounce over the rear end enough to be annoying, no where else really that I ever notice but the bounce is jarring enough to be noticeable and irritating. I'm running Steeda: diff bushings, IRS supports, IRS braces, and sway bar.
 

Norm Peterson

corner barstool sitter
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Threads
11
Messages
8,852
Reaction score
4,652
Location
On a corner barstool not too far from I-95
First Name
Norm
Vehicle(s)
'08 GT #85, '19 WRX
Sounds like insufficient rear shock damping or possibly a mis-match between bump damping and rebound damping. I'm assuming that this bouncing isn't a harsh thing, just a refusal to settle down.


Norm
 

fcarpio

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Threads
23
Messages
170
Reaction score
18
Location
South Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Springs will help with this.
I got the Eibach SportLines and made my suspension worse, made it feel like the car was floating. Not nice at all. Then I got the Steeda shocks and struts, problem solved. The car has a slightly stiffer suspension but it feels very planted.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,907
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
Sounds like insufficient rear shock damping or possibly a mis-match between bump damping and rebound damping. I'm assuming that this bouncing isn't a harsh thing, just a refusal to settle down.


Norm
It's this plus a poor shock mount design (at body and control arm) that induces bind and added sliding friction in the shock, as well as stiction to a degree.
Sponsored

 
 








Top