Sponsored

New CAFE Standard Yesterday

Status
Not open for further replies.

dmcg940

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
142
Reaction score
170
Location
Valrico, Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
21 Mustang GT Premium, 94 Mustang GT
So the Biden Admin (bless their hearts) announced yesterday that they have raised the current 41 mpg CAFE standard to 56 mpg, effective with the 2026 model year. Good Lord almighty! That's less than one product cycle from now. Very few current car models meet that standard, much less any manufacturer's full fleet.

So what does that imply? I think it means you should buy your last Coyote as soon as you can. Ford can't stand a 19 mpg Mustang if it has to average 55 mpg. I think it means if you want any car bigger than a breadbox and not powered by an electric motor, you better make your plans. That 56 mpg number isn't based on practicality or engineering or attainability. It's a number the Biden admin grabbed out of a hat and it's going to have huge repercussions. But maybe (probably?) that's what they intended. Whatever, the auto industry won't ever be the same. Even if the Dems lose in 2024 and the Republicans back off that standard, decisions and plans have to be made now and in the next year or two to accommodate production schedules for 2026. The train is leaving the station, forever. Shed a tear.
Sponsored

 

EFI

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
4,818
Reaction score
4,134
Location
Masshole central
Vehicle(s)
5.Br0
Great, so let's concentrate most of our efforts on a tiny portion of a tiny portion of overall global emissions and pollution. Nevermind that a couple of un-regulated countries produce a majority of pollution. Nevermind that cruise ships produce 10x more pollution than all cars in the world.

This isn't about saving the environment anymore, it's purely political/monetary.
 

FreePenguin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Threads
81
Messages
5,398
Reaction score
3,713
Location
Ohio
First Name
Donald
Vehicle(s)
17 mustang
Vehicle Showcase
1
uhm. that isnt possible with full sized vehicles and gas engines.
does that mean they are doing this because the build back bill failed? so instead of giving people incentives to buy electric, they are just banning gasers from being produced because cant meet the requirement?

this is bad.
 

vdin

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
16
Reaction score
8
Location
NV
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT 6mt
This is slightly above the standard Obama set for the same time period at 54.5mpg. I pretty sure car makers were already in motion with their plans to reduce emissions significantly through electrification, hybridization, turbos, etc. IMO this changes nothing.
 
OP
OP
dmcg940

dmcg940

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
142
Reaction score
170
Location
Valrico, Florida
First Name
David
Vehicle(s)
21 Mustang GT Premium, 94 Mustang GT
This is slightly above the standard Obama set for the same time period at 54.5mpg. I pretty sure car makers were already in motion with their plans to reduce emissions significantly through electrification, hybridization, turbos, etc. IMO this changes nothing.
What do you mean, this changes nothing? Name an ICE vehicle in production today that meets the standard. And no, the manufacturers were politically in favor of the Obama 47.5 mpg standard but were never on track to meet it. This new 56 mpg standard, a mere 48 months from now, is a huge mountain to climb. It is nearly a third above the current requirement, which most manufacturers struggle to meet.
 

Crowd Hunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 5, 2020
Threads
8
Messages
650
Reaction score
730
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle(s)
$hitbox
Status
Not open for further replies.
 




Top