Hack
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Threads
- 83
- Messages
- 12,318
- Reaction score
- 7,486
- Location
- Minneapolis
- Vehicle(s)
- Mustang, Camaro
Agreed - it's a marketing device. Electronics can easily limit or apply torque in a smooth manner if necessary to help the gearbox live, though.Transmissions in EVs are good for speed... Not range due to losses in the transmission itself (driveline loss). That is why the most you see in EVs today are 2 speed gear boxes if any. One gear for low and one for high speed. I seriously doubt that MT82 can survive behind that motor for to long. It is not really the amount of torque but the fact that it is instantaneous that destroys a transmission.
Certainly a interesting concept and a great tool to get more people on board with an EV mustang but nothing more.
That is a dystopian future. I prefer to believe in the ingenuity of the human race and hope that we can find a way to continue driving cars that are powered by explosions and give more freedom back to the people. It's obvious that the people on this web forum want V8 gas engines. In my opinion it's not right for the government to take those engines away from us. If people on here really believed the environmental BS they certainly wouldn't be driving Mustangs, right?So its almost a guarantee that in 10-20 years, this is the future of mustangs.
Completely untrue. Batteries keep changing and improving. There's no consistent battery construction/tech that you can point to and say something is "long proven".Which is why coal is on its way out also. It's been long proved that even including recycling the battery over the life of an electric car its still better for the environment than a gas car.
Sponsored