Skye
Well-Known Member
The problem is bad enough, idling should be generating large amounts of oil. I wouldn't go on any more test drives, for fear enough liquid in one cylinder would cause physical damage to the piston, block or crank. The engine might still be recoverable.
So before the head gasket replacement, cylinder #2 had a loss of 98% of initial pressure. Afterwards, that cylinder and the others were normal (zero-to-little loss of pressure). Check.
But the original problem, huge intake of oil, continued.
As others have mentioned, the turbo itself might be the culprit, emptying large amounts of oil into the intake. Cylinder #2 was an unfortunate casualty.
No one has disconnected and inspected the turbo and intake assemblies yet? I would have thought that'd be accomplished when the head gasket was replaced.
Edit,
But maybe they did, and assumed any oil was a result of the head gasket failure. Thinking the gasket was the culprit, any oil seen in the turbo assembly or intake was coming from cylinder #2, when the cause-and-effect was the other way around: loss of oil from a failed turbo seal drove the head gasket failure.
So before the head gasket replacement, cylinder #2 had a loss of 98% of initial pressure. Afterwards, that cylinder and the others were normal (zero-to-little loss of pressure). Check.
But the original problem, huge intake of oil, continued.
As others have mentioned, the turbo itself might be the culprit, emptying large amounts of oil into the intake. Cylinder #2 was an unfortunate casualty.
No one has disconnected and inspected the turbo and intake assemblies yet? I would have thought that'd be accomplished when the head gasket was replaced.
Edit,
But maybe they did, and assumed any oil was a result of the head gasket failure. Thinking the gasket was the culprit, any oil seen in the turbo assembly or intake was coming from cylinder #2, when the cause-and-effect was the other way around: loss of oil from a failed turbo seal drove the head gasket failure.
Sponsored
Last edited: