jma406
Well-Known Member
The show is May 22. I heard Ford is going to have a semi trailer there, don't know what that is all about.Is it this weekend or next? I may try to make the trip
Sponsored
The show is May 22. I heard Ford is going to have a semi trailer there, don't know what that is all about.Is it this weekend or next? I may try to make the trip
A couple of comments on your post. I wont disagree with you much except that, Carroll had input with Ford Engineers, and, he used it. When they changed the location on the snake on the 13/14 cars, that actually asked if it was OK. The larger tires on the 07 cars is because of Carroll. Does it mean Carroll was a major part? No, it means he oversaw some part of the program. Carroll went after what he created, nothing more, nothing less. Not sure why that is hard to understand. One other fact, Jim Owens is the Shelby Marketing Manager for Ford. He worked for Carroll and understood him well.Yeah...
I see the GT500 and GT350 as more a product of SVT more than anything Shelby is remotely responsible for. Ford likely only needed Shelby for the licensing of a iconic name.
There isnt anything, mustang related, Shelby America does that impresses me anymore.
The SVT cars like the 95 and 00 Cobra R's set the stage. The 03/04 Terminator set up the events to come with the GT500. It could have simply been another Cobra and been every bit as good, I kinda wish the simple Cobra name had stayed.
/edit
Also not a fan of the way Shelby went after companies like Factory Five. The demand was there and he pissed all over everything in an attempt to mark his territory.
My matching pair of mint Ford Motorsport fender covers (which I still use) are cooler.Now that Ford Racing is gone I really enjoy wearing my Ford Racing shirt to a few events as it is now a collectors item.
I didn't want to say - but you're right.Lol the Shelby America cars are pure eyesores
Sometimes ideas and philosophies (when followed through and executed well) are almost more important than the actual build.
The '65 GT350 was a lot more similar to a standard Mustang GT IMO than a 2015/16 GT350 is to the Mustang GT now. The changes in '65 were very minor.
With all due respect the '65 GT350 and the '65 Mustang were tremendously different and possibly even more so than with the new 2015/2016 GT350 versus the same Mustang GT in my opinion.
I have owned a '65 Mustang 2+2 K code and have been in my buddies '65 GT350 and these two cars are worlds apart from a performance and build standpoint.
I could list at least 10 significant differences between these two cars and those differences are the reason that the '65 GT350 is by far the most valuable of all regular production Shelby's.
Having said that, I certainly respect where you are going overall but the changes in a '65 GT350 were in fact not minor but significant to say the least.
Carroll and his team of Pete Brock, Klaus Arning, Chuck Cantwell, Ken Miles, Jerry Titus, Jerry Schwartz, Lew Spencer and others went overboard on the '65 Shelby GT350 and especially on the 37 R models that they ultimately built as well.
:cheers:
You've got to be kidding. Certainly no disrespect to the original, a great car for it's time. But seriously, lets list the differences:Sometimes ideas and philosophies (when followed through and executed well) are almost more important than the actual build.
The '65 GT350 was a lot more similar to a standard Mustang GT IMO than a 2015/16 GT350 is to the Mustang GT now. The changes in '65 were very minor.
With all due respect the '65 GT350 and the '65 Mustang were tremendously different and possibly even more so than with the new 2015/2016 GT350 versus the same Mustang GT in my opinion.
I have owned a '65 Mustang 2+2 K code and have been in my buddies '65 GT350 and these two cars are worlds apart from a performance and build standpoint.
I could list at least 10 significant differences between these two cars and those differences are the reason that the '65 GT350 is by far the most valuable of all regular production Shelby's.
Having said that, I certainly respect where you are going overall but the changes in a '65 GT350 were in fact not minor but significant to say the least.
Carroll and his team of Pete Brock, Klaus Arning, Chuck Cantwell, Ken Miles, Jerry Titus, Jerry Schwartz, Lew Spencer and others went overboard on the '65 Shelby GT350 and especially on the 37 R models that they ultimately built as well.
:cheers:
This is comparing the street GT350...
1965-
Interior: gauge pod, steering wheel, belts.
Chassis: relocate stock control arms, new springs, shocks, sway bar, override traction bars.
Engine: intake, carb, headers, side exhaust, valve covers.
Exterior: hood, wheels and tires.
2015-
Interior: gauge pod, seats, steering wheel, pedals.
Chassis: shocks, wider front track, sway bar, half shafts, knuckles, springs,etc....
Engine: ALL OF IT!!! and Transmission,shifter and Drive Shaft.
Exterior: hood, fenders, front bumper, rear valence, rear spoiler, ground effects, wheels and tires.
So how is the '65 Shelby tremendously different from it's GT brother when compared to the 2015???:headbonk:
Sometimes ideas and philosophies (when followed through and executed well) are almost more important than the actual build.
The '65 GT350 was a lot more similar to a standard Mustang GT IMO than a 2015/16 GT350 is to the Mustang GT now. The changes in '65 were very minor.
With all due respect the '65 GT350 and the '65 Mustang were tremendously different and possibly even more so than with the new 2015/2016 GT350 versus the same Mustang GT in my opinion.
I have owned a '65 Mustang 2+2 K code and have been in my buddies '65 GT350 and these two cars are worlds apart from a performance and build standpoint.
I could list at least 10 significant differences between these two cars and those differences are the reason that the '65 GT350 is by far the most valuable of all regular production Shelby's.
Having said that, I certainly respect where you are going overall but the changes in a '65 GT350 were in fact not minor but significant to say the least.
Carroll and his team of Pete Brock, Klaus Arning, Chuck Cantwell, Ken Miles, Jerry Titus, Jerry Schwartz, Lew Spencer and others went overboard on the '65 Shelby GT350 and especially on the 37 R models that they ultimately built as well.
:cheers:
The 2016 GT350 is a complete supercar in comparison to the regular Mustang GT. Not sure I can say the same about the original 1965 GT350.
The new GT350 does share the same headlights as the regular Mustang (except they sit 2 inches lower in the body) - that's about all they have in common.