So many variables determines the outcome of a dyno run such as ambient temps, altitude, fuel, etc. This isn't an exact science and a difference of 10hp hardly means anything at all. You could do a dyno run tomorrow and get different numbers.Really? I was hoping for about 10 more hp/tq.
True but that is what the correction is for it should keep things close so you can see what gains were actually made. Based on the mods and his baseline dyno it seems like his result are good but could be better or should be better. Baseline 430 and after headers CAI and Tune only picking up 29 peak seems low to me.So many variables determines the outcome of a dyno run such as ambient temps, altitude, fuel, etc. This isn't an exact science and a difference of 10hp hardly means anything at all. You could do a dyno run tomorrow and get different numbers.
Those gains look on par for 93 octane. 2018s are tuned more aggressively from the factory, so you typically wont see very high gains on 93.True but that is what the correction is for it should keep things close so you can see what gains were actually made. Based on the mods and his baseline dyno it seems like his result are good but could be better or should be better. Baseline 430 and after headers CAI and Tune only picking up 29 peak seems low to me.
Did you data log the dyno runs? If so I would have Lund look at them and see if there is anything going on with the knock sensors and see what kind of timing the car is running...thats what I thought too
Was that on e85 or 91/93?Didn't someone post up about getting about 30whp from intake and tune alone in a 2018?
Those are his stock numbers which is why 29 hp gain doesn't seem right.Those numbers (460/414) look decent for headers, CAI, and 93 octane tune. What mods are in the red dyno curve?
Jerome