BEERCHAMP
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2020
- Threads
- 7
- Messages
- 164
- Reaction score
- 539
- Location
- North Las Vegas
- First Name
- Steve
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Mustang GT/CS
How do you dispose of EVs when they get old? EPA danger of batteries?
Sponsored
Smart solar or atomic. Done.Until they have a large scale way to create hydrogen which doesn't use more energy than it creates it'll never fly.
Still takes more energy to make than you get back In hydrogen. It's technically net negative energy.
They claim they will be repurposed. They do ultimately have an end of life though.How do you dispose of EVs when they get old? EPA danger of batteries?
That’s common sense. They don’t make that anymore.Let’s also not forget that unless all the other countries in the world follow suit, the environmental impact will remain very close to what it is today. Also, the amount of energy needed to fully support the “notion...or dream?” of 100% EVs will have its own set of environmental consequences.
1000000000% agree!That’s common sense. They don’t make that anymore.
There will be no problem getting gas in 15 years. If electric cars were the only thing made starting tomorrow, it would take 20-25 years to get ride of ice vehicles. But that's not happening of course. By most accounts I've read, by 2040 (or so) only around 50-60% of new car sales will be electric. Even if all of that is sped up, the bottom line is that ICE cars will be around for quite a long time and so will gasoline. That said, I could see new V8's die out in 5-10 years with ICE engines being relagated to turbo 4 bangers, hybrids, etc.That article did not have anything from Widmann that said the V8 is safe, just that the current ones are really powerful. Our problem will be getting gasoline in 15 yeats.
I read last week than Manitoba is implementing an annual EV tax of I think $120 per year to cover lost gas tax revenue....The biggest stumbling block in my state is how they are going to get the tax money out of the populace when people no longer use gasoline. They said they will figure that out first and then implement. It will probably be a drive by mile automatically billed. The tech exists.
The rest is just details...
There are two ways of producing hydrogen at present. Blue Hydrogen made from natural gas which produces CO2 in the process which has to be locked up. Green Hydrogen is produced from seawater using 'spare' electricity. Now I'm sure the first thing some will say is what 'spare' electricity but actually this is a problem the UK is facing and actually caused our most recent supply problem. A large part of our generation is offshore wind power and this frequently produces too much electricity (you can't turn the wind off) so actually using this at times of low demand to produce Hydrogen is an eminently sensible idea.Until they have a large scale way to create hydrogen which doesn't use more energy than it creates it'll never fly.
Still takes more energy to make than you get back In hydrogen. It's technically net negative energy.
Yes and no. Agree hydrogen fuel cell as a source of electricity for your electric car is very sensible but it would still involve batteries - the Mirai has a battery on board but very small compared to a full BEV. So fuel cell cars are just another evolution of the EV, not dissimilar to a PHEV in concept. So I think technically you are saying BEV's are a joke compared to say a PHEV of FCV, as all are a form of EVToyota has a hydrogen car, claims it can be refilled to 400 mile range in 5 min.
Hydrogen is the answer. EV's are a joke.
With hydrogen we can keep our V8 and be green
This of course depends where you live and the car market is global. You may live in a country where ICE cars are not banned, but if everywhere else is, then they still will not get made. With no ICE cars to be sold after 2030 in Europe that is one big market that is closing to ICE cars and will impact carmakers - especially when they see the direction of travel.There will be no problem getting gas in 15 years. If electric cars were the only thing made starting tomorrow, it would take 20-25 years to get ride of ice vehicles. But that's not happening of course. By most accounts I've read, by 2040 (or so) only around 50-60% of new car sales will be electric. Even if all of that is sped up, the bottom line is that ICE cars will be around for quite a long time and so will gasoline. That said, I could see new V8's die out in 5-10 years with ICE engines being relagated to turbo 4 bangers, hybrids, etc.
The amount of energy at point of use will not change, but the SOURCE of that energy will. Also don't forget just how inefficient the ICE engine is compared to an electric motor / generator. A car engine manages 25% efficiency compared to an electric motor at 75% to nearly 100%. ICE's generate a LOT of waste heat.Let’s also not forget that unless all the other countries in the world follow suit, the environmental impact will remain very close to what it is today. Also, the amount of energy needed to fully support the “notion...or dream?” of 100% EVs will have its own set of environmental consequences.
Well apart from the battery an EV is no different to a regular ICE car, of which about 85% is recycled in the US and this has increased rapidly in recent years where car design has aided recycling. VW is now starting a battery recycling plant as well as Renault, but they have time on their side. EV batteries effectively last the lifetime of the vehicle and then some when repurposed so 15 years is not an unreasonable estimate of lifetime.How do you dispose of EVs when they get old? EPA danger of batteries?