Juben
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Threads
- 35
- Messages
- 2,519
- Reaction score
- 809
- Location
- Chattanooga, TN
- First Name
- Justin
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 EcoBoost Mustang (AT) w/PP
There's a thread I've been monitoring where the injector flow rate on the failed cylinder was considerably less than the flow rate on the other cylinders in failed FoST engines. Although this has not been definitively confirmed as a source point of failures, some early data would seem to suggest to this being a culprit.BTW, a common cause of stock engines blowing is a stuck injector (well, on the fractions of a percent that do fail). This has been tracked down on numerous F150's, ST's etc. Something to consider
Although a fuel system cleaner wouldn't clean the valves, it might be prudent to run a bottle of high quality fuel system cleaner, like the Chevron w/Techron, through the fuel system every 10k miles or so to help keep the injectors themselves clean. That's what I've done with my rides, both EcoBoost and non-EcoBoost alike, for a number of years.
If you think about the operating environment of the injectors in a DI setup over a PI setup, it would seem plausible that the injectors would stand to have a higher chance of build up thereby limiting flow. When you limit flow on an injector, especially on a high performance engine, bad things can happen.
I've wanted to discuss this topic more in detail, however, since the findings and theories are still in the early stages, I didn't want to cause a panic around here. I would love to see some data on the injectors from the failed EBM engines to see if there's any similarities with what's being seen on the FoSTs.
Sponsored