Blk2015GT
Well-Known Member
I do, but they ended up spending more fighting it on principle than the repair would've cost full price. The dealership/Ford has WAY more money than all of us here combined to fight.You don't have to agree, but you aren't going to change Ford's decision either. People want to wave MagMoss around, but do you really know anyone who has been successful with that? It wasn't intended to be used to defend aftermarket performance parts, but aftermarket alternatives to oem parts.
Now they did get back their attorney's fees for winning per the statute, but after laying out 5 figures and months/years later. But all of that time down the hole and stress you'll never get back. It's just not worth is 99% of the time.
Some people are too stubborn to convince though what is in their bet interest. More money than brains.
It's VERY rare to win a MagMoss auto case, and even then, most of the caselaw (wins) out there have nothing to do with aftermarket mods but rather where one went to get the car serviced or bad repairs done by dealership.
Again the statutory intent is to prohibit voiding a warranty for an aftermarket part that is substantially similar to OEM- say a Fram oil filter instead of Motorcraft (Ford OEM) or to get your oil changes/service at mom and pop shop and not the dealership, NOT to modify the parameters of your vehicle (engine, ECU, etc) via aftermarket parts and try to waive the Mag Moss Act as a shield.
Sponsored
Last edited: