HextallS550
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
- Threads
- 19
- Messages
- 1,182
- Reaction score
- 663
- Location
- Dearborn, MI
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 GT
I can see doing the rear deck in your case, but not to prevent flex, adding actual structural material would be better IF you have flex. I'm going to use two Hybrid Audio subs mounted to the rear deck with CNC'd aluminum rings. I'm also going to do the GT350R rear seat delete and use something to cover the ski hole. I have a large piece of carbon fiber from a front splitter on one our road race cars. I thought of cutting it down and using it or it will just go in the scarp pile, LOL.Oh the deadening debate LOL!
From an engineering testing standpoint, where we deal in reality and testing and results and NOT theory, (I base my advice around this) there are areas that need certain materials and areas where myths have taken hold, such as adding layer upon layer of Dynamat like material to the floor pan because you saw someone do it.
You have to step back and understand what stereo is; left and right information that when combined and processed by your ears and brain creates an image, this image has height and depth and placement of certain sounds (instruments for example or a voice).So, why is spending money on rear speakers a waste? If adding an amp, should we keep the factory speakers there, or install woofers instead of coaxials?
Because stereo ONLY consists of L/R information adding drivers behind you skews this imaging. It pulls the information rearward.
I hate to talk in competition terms but the best cars over the years have always had a strong front stage sometimes even incorporating their sub-bass up front as well. The old analogy of "You wouldn't go to a concert and face rearwards or turn sideways would you" may be an easier way to think of this.
In home audio where 5.1 or 7.2 or 23.5 or whatever BS they come up with next, rear speakers make sense because that information they receive is not simply L/R. It's RR and LR. The source material is recorded and mastered with this information. Yes there are processors for 5.1 in a car and if you're going to invest in a DSP you can consider that. But if your primary goal is CD's, digital rips on your phone, SAT or FM HD it's pointless because that information was recorded L/R NOT FL/C/FR, RR/RL, SUB.
Another possibility in the car that has worked for people in the past was 3.1. AudioControl made an awesome little processor called the Model 90 or 25, I forget which. It took the L/R info from your decks output and seperated and synthesized it so that it's RCA out puts would be fed to you amplifier with L/R info and the internal amp in Model 90 would power the center channel and provide it's C information.
Sponsored