Where in CO do you live?This is logical. Thanks!
Ok, so it isn't necessarily that AWD would be "worse", but just may not suit the taste of the manufacturer/engineer/driver. Got it.
I have two SUVs for inclement weather (Touareg & MDX). As I probably wouldn't go all out with a GT500/GT350/etc, I'm shopping against numerous coupes that do have AWD, albeit not in the blown out models (M/RS/AMG/etc).
The separation of the the power (provided by rear wheels) and steering (provided by front wheels) allows for a 'purer' driving experience where the two aren't messing with each other and mucking up the driving experience.This is what I'm trying to understand. Can someone define how RWD provides a more "pure" driving experience vs AWD?
I'm in the foothills and we normally get about twice the accumulation of the metro area. The house faces North (no sun melt in the front/drive), and our driveway has a section of 30 degree incline - previous FWD cars had issues in slick conditions.Where in CO do you live?
You know as well as I do, while we get plenty of snow, it is around for what, 2 days? Unless of course you are up in the Mountains.
In the foothills, there are really only 10 days a year where snow would be a problem.
And you have two SUVs anyways -- you are good. And you don't have to have AWD even if you are not a great driver. You will learn. I think AWD gives a false sense of security, and once you do become better, RWD will be much more enjoyable.
This makes a lot of sense to me regarding why it's definitely not happening now. Great points.Unlikely, given the sales volumes of this car currently. I don't see how the platform would be modified without a major reworking at this point, especially since the independent rear suspension was the BIG change. Also, the weight penalty would be another consideration, which is counter to the slimming down that has been forecasted.
This is what I was looking for! I came across a similar explanation earlier today while researching. The next question is does this separation affect daily driving, or only when a car is pushed to its limits?The separation of the the power (provided by rear wheels) and steering (provided by front wheels) allows for a 'purer' driving experience where the two aren't messing with each other and mucking up the driving experience.
Don't get me wrong, AWD has its advantages of course (bad weather, launching, putting down a lot of power to the ground effectively), but if you were just to compare RWD vs AWD, most would agree that RWD provides the purer driving experience.
Any power going through the front wheels will have an impact on the feel of the steering, so RWD cars are said to be "purer".This is what I'm trying to understand. Can someone define how RWD provides a more "pure" driving experience vs AWD?
I really hope something like this happens. It'd be a smart thing to do for development costs of the platform and image boost for Lincoln.Here's a possiblity, MKR. With Lincoln most likely getting use of S550 (in a longer wheelbase variant) and that company's current leaning toward FWD and AWD drivetrains perhaps we will see this very car, albeit behind a Lincoln Star instead of a running horse. Oh, and with 4 doors instead of 2.
I lived the first 29 years of my life in St. Louis, then 3 years in Washington DC. How do you think my 1970 AMC AMX and 1979 Trans Am did in snow and so forth? Good! Why? Limited slip differentials, and studded snow tires on different wheels for winter. When traffic was stopped on 40 in St. Louis one snowy Winter day and I needed to get to college, I drove the AMX up the snow-covered grass area between the freeway and the service road, onto the service road, and around the traffic mess. I've seen drivers too cheap or ignorant to have a limited slip and proper tires pin one wheel until the tire blew up. if you look in my introduction posting, you will see I've owned a number of front wheel drive cars, but have no interest in ever owning another.Wet, snow, and loose....