Depends on how much toe you have (for wear). It also means you'll have less straight line grip, and will only access the full grip of the rear tires when driving HARD. And when doing that your front will lose its optimum contact patch before the rear, so it'll have more of a tendency to understeer at the limit.
so you went to shop known for alignments and they sent you home with the rear camber out of spec? even though it is adjustable with factory parts, hell the front is even out of spec, but as repeatedly said, not adjustable without parts......
About 0.10 toe in per side, even left and right.
Hmmmm . . . didn't expect it to be quite that much, unless perhaps the lateral links are running a good bit uphill toward the chassis at nominal ride height.
They assured me it would be fine, but you're right. Should I call them and go back to get it closer to 1~?
They're pretty short compared with the lower control arm. That gets you a lot of camber change.
Are we both talking about the same end of the car? I was referencing the front's strut suspension.
I was talking about the rear only. I think we've both commented in the past that the likely reason for the relatively high static rear camber spec is for safety margin/intentional understeer built in. Agreed though that it is pretty high for the amount of gain it has. I've measured a couple cars rear camber change now in heave alone (measured before and after lowering the car).
