WCRookie99
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Sponsored
Cool, thanks - maybe just add to your signature?465.96hp at rear wheels/divided by .85 = 548hp
My mods are posted on another thread, let me find the link.
Ok then I’m filling a law suit against Ford because they rate the hp at 480 vs 466lol @ 548.
No one estimates crank hp based off whp anymore, and further -- 15 percent is wildly optimistic.
Your car makes 466 hp. Congrats on the solid pull.
lol. Im sure she runs good. Sharp car.Ok then I’m filling a law suit against Ford because they rate the hp at 480 vs 466
Dumb!
do you need a tune at that point?
need no, did I get one yes.do you need a tune at that point?
I don't know man, if I am asked how much power my car makes I am telling them crank HP cause people don't understand WHP. You tell them I make 466WHP they be like but the magazine says it makes 480....lol @ 548.
No one estimates crank hp based off whp anymore, and further -- 15 percent is wildly optimistic.
Your car makes 466 hp. Congrats on the solid pull.
Yeah that was click bait for sure lolLooks good, what mods?
EDIT-Did I fall for click-bait here with the subject line showing 548hp and the dyno graph indicates 466 OR was the 548 backed into from the WHP.
Either way 466 wheel or 548 engine indicates mods.
How did you get the 0.85 coefficient? Is it something measurable, or something to be known for Mustangs or this particular engine/drivetrain combo?465.96hp at rear wheels/divided by .85 = 548hp