Sponsored

2016 PAX/RTP Index

WatchSquid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Threads
24
Messages
631
Reaction score
178
Location
D/FW Texas
First Name
Jim
Vehicle(s)
93 Reef Blue Mustang convertible

jpaulson

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
153
Reaction score
62
Location
Portland, OR
Vehicle(s)
2016 GTPP
PAX sux :p

... but since i know some guys love it and/or are stuck in smaller regions where it's the only way you can "compete", feast your eyes on this just released beauty:

STP 0.847

have fun with that!
That number is WAY too close to ESP to be legit......
 

Sponsored

z3papa

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2015
Threads
0
Messages
67
Reaction score
7
Location
Illinois
Vehicle(s)
2011 BMW M3
Doesn't make sense compared to ESP.


Simmons
It's a lot better than .847. I have expressed my feelings what CAM-C and STP should be. My feeling is CAM-C is a little soft still, and STP a little hard but at least they make more sense than before.
 

Simmons-Racing

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Threads
24
Messages
432
Reaction score
124
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
It's a lot better than .847. I have expressed my feelings what CAM-C and STP should be. My feeling is CAM-C is a little soft still, and STP a little hard but at least they make more sense than before.
Agreed on both
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
14,989
Reaction score
8,910
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
I was shocked when I saw .847 for STP. Glad to see they've revised it to something more reasonable. It's still too high, IMO, given the size and weight of most of the cars involved.
Sponsored

 
 








Top