2016 GTPP vs Evo X MR dragy times.

jrsimon27

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2015
Messages
641
Reaction score
143
Location
Outside the USA
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT 2016 PP
Own both cars used dragy to test them.
GT has lund tune Awe cattback and aem drop in airfilter did use LC.
Evo X has tune catt delete an ets open airfilter did not use LC.
Times are slow cause iam at a high altitud. But its a good comparo.
Testing was done on the street.
Evo was a bit faster lower traps.
Both cars on 93oct.

SmartSelect_20201221-132538_dragy.jpg


Screenshot_20201220-104830_dragy.jpg


SmartSelect_20210111-223519_Photos.jpg





Advertisement

 

import111

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2015
Messages
134
Reaction score
29
Location
Tucson, AZ.
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
I went from an Evo X to a 2016 Mustang GT PP, and your comparo is exactly what I would expect.
 

re-rx7

Ruck the night away
Joined
May 24, 2015
Messages
757
Reaction score
302
Location
Gainesville, Tx
First Name
Brandon
Vehicle(s)
19 5.0
The mustang is at more of a disadvantage due to not being f/i. At sea level the comparo would be way diff
 

Advertisement





 
28 - Boomba Racing - 1


Advertisement
Top