WestRace
Well-Known Member
I think most modern autos have some sort of locking mechanism to improve fuel mileage, but still I don't think they are fast enough for transient conditions. I am sure the AMG's auto is better than most but probably still not fast enough for constant shifting during acceleration and decceleration for example on track conditions.FWIW, there are talks among the officials at IMSA to allow automatic and DCT and automatic transmissions into CTSCC in the near future because that's the way of the future. This would open the door to a lot of cars like the C63 which would be awesome to see. Heck, you can't get a Porsche GT3 with a manual anymore.
On that note, both the 991 GT3 street car and GT3 racecars use paddleshift transmissions (albeit street = dual clutch, race = sequential box). There's no question that DCT makes a car FASTER on track, not just 'keep pace' with a manual.
I think the AMG cars have a locking torque converter, and are quite good, like your comment of people complaining about SMG transmissions (which I agree are far from as bad as everyone says they are). I never minded E46 M3 or E60 M5's SMG transmissions, or 360/F430's single clutch sequential transmissions since they shift faster than most people and with a brief lift of the throttle during the shift, they can be quite smooth. However, the DCT transmissions in modern ///M cars, PDK, GTR's, & 458 Italias are worlds better than SMG, are much faster, and are pretty damn good and fun to drive.
0.02
Sponsored
