Angrey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Threads
- 95
- Messages
- 2,393
- Reaction score
- 2,444
- Location
- Coral Gables
- Vehicle(s)
- 2016 GT350
- Thread starter
- #31
Thanks for the insights.Just an FYI, the KTP-445U can be bridged to 90W x2 @4 Ohms in addition to running the front stage active using the 45W x 4 option. Either option still meets your goal of "little more power, some clarity and simple/compact"
One option would be to spend more on the front stage which matters the most (investing the cost of the rear speakers towards the front speakers) and drive them with 90W and see if you even miss the rear fill. Some people do and some if not many don't.
I am assuming when you said Powerboost above you meant Powerbass. IMHO, it seems backwards to be spending quite a bit more on the rear stage then the front stage. The Powerbass eases installation but who are the speakers primarily for, the driver or the passengers in the rear? In the end its your decision but I thought I would respectfully offer one perspective. As other's pointed out in this thread there are other speakers that go in pretty seamlessly some which may be more efficient at using the power that's available to them.
There is a way to run the fronts on your Alpine amp and the rears on the factory radio's internal amp but I won't get into it since it does require Forscan changes and a modification of the Alpine harness but neither are really difficult IF you wanted to take a chance on a strong front stage and add rear fill if you actually missed it. I just mention it so you know you have an out without having to buy another amp if you decide to try front stage only and need to add the rears back at a later time.
Some people try to test having no rear fill by running their factory radio with the balance all the way forward for an extended period of time but you are still on factory power so it really doesn't represent what it would be like with a proper front stage. The factory front stage just doesn't fill the cabin the way 90W with good speakers would and its why I think many people still think they need it, the front is too under powered allowing you to miss the rears. Many of the best sounding systems I sat in during an SQ competition last year didn't have rear fill at all. I realize you are not building a high end system but there is something to be learned about where it may be best to put your money. One approach let's you build on an install if you decide to get more into the car audio part, the other approach may cause you to start over discarding most if not all of what you did the first go around and no harm no foul if you never move forward with more but in the long run I believe you will only be as happy as the strength of the front stage. Lots of threads about people upgrading only parts of their system and being disappointed rather then addressing DSP, power, and speaker quality all at once.
I will say this though, I picked up two used KTP-445U in new condition for $65 each. Ironincally, I bought these from an SQ guy who wanted to experiment with rear fill and pulled them out when he decided he didn't need the rear fill.
Although I am setting my system up with more power then these, these were cheap enough that I want to do a little car stereo lab with these and do some A/B comparisons, run with and without rear fill, bridged and unbridged, etc...
I'd be interested in learning how to power all 6 speakers (4 on the alpine and 2 on the OEM puny amp). Which 2 speakers do you think would be best to remain on stock amp power?
Sponsored