Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
Site won't let me edit?
Norm
Norm
Sponsored
So you can't be a real driver if you drive the Z/28? That would make them what, fictional?The z28 would be a great car for many over there, a wanna be car for a wanna be driver.

Well you're more than picking up the slack in that department, that's for sure.Nobody have the b@lls to question Chevy's Milford media laps? Doesn't that seem strange to you? The lap was done with very little effort and not much speed at all.
That's a bit of a generalization, don't you think?Only people on Camaro5 would believe that, even after independent test say otherwise. So desperate for a victory it's actually pretty demeaning to your characters.
False. Like I've already said, most Z/28 owners are going to be rich middle aged / older men that are buying this because of the name (Z/28), because it's the next "cool" thing out, or as a d!ck measuring tool :headbonk:Most z28 owners won't be interested in racing, simply because they can't
Possibly. Chevy has refered to the Z/28 as being track capable several times.Chevy is misrepresenting the z28 in road racing, selling the car as a showroom race car right? It isn't legal anywhere for multiple reasons.
I don't get why you say you can't track / race the car. You can easily do that, now can you go race it in any sanctioned event? That's a different story. You're falling prey to reading too much into Chevy's marketing. However IF Chevy came out and said the Z/28 is going into X racing event and racing in Y class while being completely false, then we have a problem. But to my knowledge they haven't said the Z/28 is targeted/can race in X specific event. Correct me if I'm wrong.
You tell me, what is the purpose of the 2014 Camaro z28??? In your own words... I want to say racing but, we know better than that.
Norm beat me to it..So it still comes down to the difference between "track-capable"* and "race-series-legal". Or if you prefer, between "track-capable" and "race-legal-in-a-series-where-it-actually-has-better-than-a-snowball's-chance".
* my term; Chevy uses a few more words to say the same thing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevrolet.com/culture/article/camaro-z28-returns-2014
Lightweight, nimble and incredibly powerful, the original Z/28 was designed ideally for road racing. The 2014 Z/28 carries the same racing credentials
Anybody who misreads that to mean class-legal - let alone be dominant in that class - is guilty of reading way too much into Chevy's advertising copy. Anybody. The comparison is only between the new car's basic design intent (hard-core road-race oriented) and the original Z/28's raison d'ĂŞtre.
Then again, the sort of person who reads the advertising and stays all starry-eyed over it is not likely to be the same guy who has ever seriously read anybody's rulebook to discover what is or isn't class-legal anywhere. Never mind reading for enough comprehension to settle any curiosity about "grey areas" or if some sort of "de-modding" and sanctioning body approval might be required in order to run it somewhere where it at least stands a chance.
Does this mean that Chevy is misleading its potential customers? Possibly. Maybe even probably. Does that absolve said customers from doing their own due diligence? At this price point, no.
I get that there were high hopes and great expectations for the Z/28 over on Camaro5.com (and you might consider how the people active in that particular sub-forum actually use their cars).
Downstream from that, if we aren't a little careful, something similar could happen here if hopes and expectations grab control of the reins for, say, a Boss-trim S550. Like with the Z/28, there doesn't seem to be a whole lot about any S550 or its road course capability that's public knowledge yet.
FWIW, the Z/28 ride-alongs given to the various media weren't even given at the same intensity. Chris Frezza didn't get nearly as hard of a drive as the guy from slash-whatever, and I feel a little bad for Chris. Kind of aside from this is that the drivers consistently put all four wheels all the way off and to the inside of the curbing in the right hand ess turn. If they really wanted to demonstrate nimble handling, they'd at most only put the right side wheels on the curbing. Of course, if they drove that line they probably wouldn't consistently break 2 minutes flat at the same self-imposed "8/10ths" limit.
Norm
Once again you continue to be fact challenged. Per the 2013 SCCA General Competition Rules - page 111 - “9.4. ROLL CAGES FOR GT AND PRODUCTION BASED CARS - All cars must utilize a roll cage compliant with the following specifica*tions…”All SCCA/NASA Showroom Stock classes, Am Sedan classes and SCCA T3 class are all OEM with NO CAGE. NASA Time Trials can be run stock as well, it's up to the teams to manage penalty points. These are off the top of my head and pertaining to RWD coupes. There are Compact classes that are OEM. The SCCA has quite a few classes that have little or no modifications. In fact, Amateur classes do not require cages is the SCCA. That is a huge list of cars. Due to the CC brakes, tires and disc diameter (LS7 sometimes too), Pro racing for the z28 is probably out of the question. Am classes in SCCA and NASA still require Iron disc... and a maximum of 14 inch disc as well (I think this is worldwide as well).
This statement reflects a complete misunderstanding of the rules and is wrong in every respect.You do know that the classes you are suggesting the z28 compete in (LOL) are indeed non-production right? ST1, ST2, ST3 and SU (LOL) are all non-production classes. This was why I posted the New car list. Chevy needs to get on that list in order to compete in Super Touring. It would take a Non-production z28 to compete in that class (ST2). That said, ST2 cars use tube frames (ST1 for sure).
Correction: This THREAD reflects an intentional misunderstanding of the rules and is wrong in every respect.This statement reflects a complete misunderstanding of the rules and is wrong in every respect.
I agree with you 100%.My advice: treat this diatribe as a person singing in the shower. Best left alone. Sounds terrific to the singer. Pull back the shower curtain, and OMG!
Your vain attempts at rehabbing the patient are exactly that: in vain, when dealing with the totally vain/myopic. But credit is given for your attempts.
Were you not suggesting the stock z28 will do well in SU? That is pretty funny. I can tell your pro bro...I agree with you 100%.
I hope at least I've been able to disabuse everyone of the notion that thePill has any facts to offer about racing.
IMHO and at this price point? Yes.Is this really a car for rich old men? People are using the OEM Boss 302's, as well as the LS and 302S. Unfortunately, you are just limited to Solo Time Trials.
Here is where, I suspect, the problem lies. The price has yet to be set.That's a shame... If you exchange the huge CC brakes with 14 inch cast iron rotors and came down to a 285 all around, the price would have dropped and it would be possible to waiver the z28's LS7 due to it's 4000lbs race weight.
The 25-35 crowd would be buying them then.
I suspect that the age distribution among Z/28's built to that spec would still be slanted more towards "older" than the age distribution for the current 1LE. Disposable income is only one factor. Others include young families vs "empty nest" and fewer younger people actively wanting a pure all-performance no-frills car.That's a shame... If you exchange the huge CC brakes with 14 inch cast iron rotors and came down to a 285 all around, the price would have dropped and it would be possible to waiver the z28's LS7 due to it's 4000lbs race weight
The 25-35 crowd would be buying them then.