Whipple guys...flight control and tune?

[pro 5.0]

It is on order, looking forward to it.

I guess you finally gave up on the TT kit ?

Sponsored

 

[RockStang]

Do you know if any who has tried lower then 3.5" on 6rib? I tried 3.5" but im at 6700' so I need more

I ran the 3.5 with Octanium and Whipple tune. Switching to a new tuner right now so I'm back to the 3.625 and pump gas until it's dialed in.

 

[pro 5.0]

I ran the 3.5 with Octanium and Whipple tune. Switching to a new tuner right now so I'm back to the 3.625 and pump gas until it's dialed in.

Was this using 91 or 93 octane as a base fuel and I assume 1 full can of Octanium per 15 gal tank ?

 

[RockStang]

93 as the base. You're supposed to mix the octanium with 10 gallons but I've mixed it with a full tank and still got great timing. It good be that you only need 96 to run the 3.5 and keep it from knocking.

 

[stang17]

Has anyone compared 1/4 mile times running full power every gear with traction control on, versus running with traction control off and cutting power back by gear with the flight software.

I'm curious how effective the traction control is compared to altering power per gear.

 

[Foxracing19931]

Do you know if any who has tried lower then 3.5" on 6rib? I tried 3.5" but im at 6700' so I need more

I've used a 3.250 with 93+ octanium for a few days was running 0.72-0.74 lambda at wot with timing floating 15-20 was hard to look at all the gauges lol knock was always negative at wot

 

[Roh92cp]

93 as the base. You're supposed to mix the octanium with 10 gallons but I've mixed it with a full tank and still got great timing. It good be that you only need 96 to run the 3.5 and keep it from knocking.

Did you ever try 93 alone with the 3.5" pulley to verify if the knock sensors where pulling timing?

 

[Roh92cp]

I've used a 3.250 with 93+ octanium for a few days was running 0.72-0.74 lambda at wot with timing floating 15-20 was hard to look at all the gauges lol knock was always negative at wot

How much power were you making with that, or any track data?

 

[Foxracing19931]

How much power were you making with that, or any track data?

Made 670 with 3.625 on just 93 so Id say over 700 I might dyno the 3.250 combo this summer for shits and giggles but nah no track it's winter in pa

 

[DAVECS1]

I guess you finally gave up on the TT kit ?

Couple things steered me down the positive displacement route. I got to go for a ride in a Roush charged car. I was a real big fan of the power delivery and sound from the positive displacement. I like the weight distribution for the TT setup, but I was a bit concerned with tracking turbos all day and the heat. Lastly some of the toys I sold for my FI fund did not sell for as much as I was hoping, so the price for this much FI was incredibly enticing.

 

[FIVE_LITER]

Made 670 with 3.625 on just 93 so Id say over 700 I might dyno the 3.250 combo this summer for shits and giggles but nah no track it's winter in pa

Long tubes or still stock headers?

 

[Doctor Fishtail]

Where are you people getting the money for these things! AAAAAAGGGG!

Hard work and dedication. ;)

 

[pro 5.0]

Made 670 with 3.625 on just 93 so Id say over 700 I might dyno the 3.250 combo this summer for shits and giggles but nah no track it's winter in pa

Are you auto or manual I thought the 3.625 pulley makes just over 700.

 

[Foxracing19931]

Long tubes or still stock headers?

Stock headers

 

[Foxracing19931]

Are you auto or manual I thought the 3.625 pulley makes just over 700.

Manual.. long tubes would put me over 700 for sure

Sponsored