Sponsored

PMAS Intake Systems from UPR Products. TUNE AND NO TUNE INTAKES

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550
Thanks for the pic, also the stock numbers you posted, was that the very first pull on the dyno or was it averaged out of other stock pulls?
I meant stock intake. Stock intake was dyno'd after PMAS. Intake temps were pretty consistent at 88* for all pulls.
Sponsored

 

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550


SAE correction should take the air out of the equation.
 

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550
Yes, absolutely.

RST, longtubes, OPG and timing sprocket are lying at home waiting to go in.
 

BobbyV

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
68
Reaction score
22
Location
New Jersey
Vehicle(s)
2015 Race Red Mustang GT 6MT
Locally done by Mike O'Grady of "OG Tuning"
Dumb question - so the gains you saw today were for the no-tune version of the PMAS intake. The tune you're running was for the flex fuel and the stock intake?
 

Sponsored

PMAS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
282
Reaction score
240
Location
Eaton Rapids, MI
Website
WWW.PMAS-MAF.com
Vehicle(s)
multiple


SAE correction should take the air out of the equation.
That's kind of a separate thing. SAE corrects the overall HP number for the DA that day for any pull. What I'm talking about changes the VE of the engine for each intake.
 

Todd15Fastback

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Threads
80
Messages
10,523
Reaction score
3,883
Location
Atlanta, GA
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP Fastback

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550
I wish I could see what the gain was here :)
It'll be at the track again. But not without headers and a clutc . I'm happy with the results. 14whp isn't anything to scoff at.

And this was the PMAS "no tune" intake put on a tuned car with NO changes to the tune.
 

Sponsored

PMAS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Threads
3
Messages
282
Reaction score
240
Location
Eaton Rapids, MI
Website
WWW.PMAS-MAF.com
Vehicle(s)
multiple
It'll be at the track again. But not without headers and a clutc . I'm happy with the results. 14whp isn't anything to scoff at.

And this was the PMAS "no tune" intake put on a tuned car with NO changes to the tune.
It's a lot easier to bolt on than a set of headers that's for sure lol.
 

SloSVO

Village Idiot
Joined
Sep 28, 2015
Threads
16
Messages
173
Reaction score
17
Location
Wild Wild West
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT
It'll be at the track again. But not without headers and a clutc . I'm happy with the results. 14whp isn't anything to scoff at.

And this was the PMAS "no tune" intake put on a tuned car with NO changes to the tune.

the only thing that makes me wonder is the use of the NT pmas intake on a car that has a modified maf xtransfer function...

Meaning the PCM has the MAF xtranfer function in it.. the NO tune PMAS sensor is recalibrated assuming that stock Xtranfer function is still in the PCM... How does it work with a re calibrated xtranfer function from the LUND tune? did you guys log AFR?
 

dev1360

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Threads
12
Messages
672
Reaction score
317
Location
STL
Vehicle(s)
DIB 2016 S550
the only thing that makes me wonder is the use of the NT pmas intake on a car that has a modified maf xtransfer function...

Meaning the PCM has the MAF xtranfer function in it.. the NO tune PMAS sensor is recalibrated assuming that stock Xtranfer function is still in the PCM... How does it work with a re calibrated xtranfer function from the LUND tune? did you guys log AFR?
My tuner is local. We logged the intake when compared. It was spot on with no changes to the tune needed. Fueling stayed within 0-2%
 
 








Top