13GetThere
Well-Known Member
I don't think I want to get involved in this one
Sponsored
Nah, that can be buffed right out.I'm pretty sure this cars warranty is void.
WARRANTIES ARE NOT VOIDED. WARRANTY CLAIMS ON THE OTHER HAND CAN BE DENIED.[/QUOTE]SO STOP SAYING
WARRANTIES ARE NOT VOIDED. WARRANTY CLAIMS ON THE OTHER HAND CAN BE DENIED.
Edited for length, but I'll bow out of the thread as this post sums up exactly what I was trying to say.Let the big boys play...
Technically, YES, the Ford New Car Warranty CAN BE VOIDED
15 U.S.C. 2310(d)(2)Who has more money for better lawyers? You or the dealer/Ford? Yes your warranty can be voided
Same pageDifference between a car that "has a warranty" but can not have warranty claims filed on it versus a car without a warranty is?.......??????
Stupid statement.
BTW? You're also wrong. So stop BS'ing everyone.
https://www.edmunds.com/auto-warranty/what-voids-your-vehicles-warranty.html
https://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/28/5-things-will-void-car-warranty/
North Carolina Law states, verbatim:
BUT A WARRANTY CAN BE VOIDED OR REPAIRS DENIED
It is possible for a manufacturer or dealer to void a warranty or to deny warranty repairs. To do so, they must be able to demonstrate that improper repairs, improper maintenance or improper upgrades resulted in damage to the component that is subject to your warranty claim dispute.
If your engine fails and your warranty claim is denied because you changed the oil yourself, that's not good enough. If they can document that the wrong type of oil was installed, too much or too little oil used, or the oil changes weren't performed according to the maintenance schedule, they may be able to deny the claim and win. If your engine failed and they are trying to say that your new tires caused it to fail, that's not good enough. They may still try to deny it, at which point you should contact the North Carolina Attorney General's Office or a lawyer.
It's also illegal and considered littering to throw cigarettes15 U.S.C. 2310(d)(2)
If a consumer finally prevails in any action brought under paragraph (1) of this subsection, he may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses (including attorneys’ fees based on actual time expended) determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the plaintiff for or in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action, unless the court in its discretion shall determine that such an award of attorneys’ fees would be inappropriate.
Well I might not be that smart, but I can read.Lol. Lot’s of smart people on a mustang forum...