MaskedRacerX
Driver
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2015
- Threads
- 73
- Messages
- 5,611
- Reaction score
- 4,688
- Location
- Vilano Beach, FL
- First Name
- DT
- Vehicle(s)
- '21_JWS4XE / '21_TM3P
I understand I was what I was subscribing to. But I can d/l songs for $0.99 each and have them forever. So if I am paying a flat fee to do the same thing and say I am a $10 per month subber for 5 years. Then gave up the service, wouldn't you think i would be able to keep the music I dloaded. After all, I technically paid for the misic. I didn't set the price. I just paid what the service provider deemed a reasonable cost for me to dload the music.
I understand also that I used the free offer, so if I paid for the fourth month, then technically I paid for the music. I am sure Apple would disagree. But that's Apple being Apple. :shrug:
Well, you can't compare the flat rate service to purchasing music. Did you see how every other streaming service (I posted a few examples) from Amazon to Google does the _same_thing_?
You paid for access to the music, using the same Terms of Service as other streaming services, the offline playback is for convenience, it's not an implied ownership of the music.
I mean, think about it, do you really think Apple, Amazon or Google is going to sell album downloads for $7.99-$9.99 *per* album, or $0.99-1.29 per track, but offer a different service where you can download 5000 albums for $10?
That makes sense, right?
Sponsored

