Sponsored

Thoughts on the new Odin TVS blower making less then Whipple TQ?

Platinum_5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Threads
12
Messages
416
Reaction score
190
Location
Edmonton, Canada
First Name
Daniel
Vehicle(s)
2021 10R Whipple
Seeing the latest Odin blower results of 750whp and 555TQ, I'm wondering what's everyone's thoughts on what happened to the TVS TQ that everyone is always talking about? A Whipple Gen 3 blower makes almost the same TQ on straight pump gas alone at 709 then the Odin at 750whp and using boostane. So what gives?
Sponsored

 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,542
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
Seeing the latest Odin blower results of 750whp and 555TQ, I'm wondering what's everyone's thoughts on what happened to the TVS TQ that everyone is always talking about? A Whipple Gen 3 blower makes almost the same TQ on straight pump gas alone at 709 then the Odin at 750whp and using boostane. So what gives?
Can you post the dyno sheet so that we can see what we’re looking at?
Here’s VMP’s own results using a 3.00” upper and some Boostane, but, they’re using a smaller TB.
For those that can’t be bothered watching, 805/595 SAE 0 smoothing, 796/590 STD smoothing 5.


Or, are you referring to this pull here, where the torque curve quite obviously takes a dive right around the point where a TVS typically does it’s best work?
F36B97C0-8A3F-4149-9E9F-B404267FEC61.png
 
Last edited:

SolarFlare

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Threads
76
Messages
4,032
Reaction score
2,213
Location
S. Fla
Vehicle(s)
2015 CO GT
I personally don’t care very much about what a dyno says or what tOrKz the car makes. Race both cars at a track with a tire both on same gas and similar peak boost and see which one works best.
 

WhiteyDog

WOOF!!!
Joined
Jun 30, 2016
Threads
15
Messages
1,789
Reaction score
731
Location
Manheim, Pa.
Vehicle(s)
'16 GT PP
I personally don’t care very much about what a dyno says or what tOrKz the car makes. Race both cars at a track with a tire both on same gas and similar peak boost and see which one works best.
Yeah kinda thinking the same thing.
 

Stymee

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2019
Threads
59
Messages
3,366
Reaction score
1,696
Location
Delray Beach, Fl.
First Name
Joel
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT
I personally don’t care very much about what a dyno says or what tOrKz the car makes. Race both cars at a track with a tire both on same gas and similar peak boost and see which one works best.

As long as both cars r setup the same, using one driver at the same track on the same day then Solarflare is right.

This is the only way to do this test
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Platinum_5.0

Platinum_5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Threads
12
Messages
416
Reaction score
190
Location
Edmonton, Canada
First Name
Daniel
Vehicle(s)
2021 10R Whipple
Or, are you referring to this pull here, where the torque curve quite obviously takes a dive right around the point where a TVS typically does it’s best work?
F36B97C0-8A3F-4149-9E9F-B404267FEC61.png
[/QUOTE]
Yes that's the results I'm referring too. Very low TQ for a TVS car. Just curious to why that may be? Something in the blower design?
 
OP
OP
Platinum_5.0

Platinum_5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Threads
12
Messages
416
Reaction score
190
Location
Edmonton, Canada
First Name
Daniel
Vehicle(s)
2021 10R Whipple
I personally don’t care very much about what a dyno says or what tOrKz the car makes. Race both cars at a track with a tire both on same gas and similar peak boost and see which one works best.
Yes I totally agree with that and I always say the same thing but then the TVS guys will always come back with dyno numbers about how the TVS makes way more TQ down low. I believe the TVS is a great blower and the GEN 3R is a great product but I'm just curious as to why this new Odin is very low on TQ? Basically on straight pump it makes 702whp. That's 48whp less without boostane. If it's only making 555TQ at 750 then what's the TQ at 702? 530? 520?
 

SolarFlare

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Threads
76
Messages
4,032
Reaction score
2,213
Location
S. Fla
Vehicle(s)
2015 CO GT
Yes I totally agree with that and I always say the same thing but then the TVS guys will always come back with dyno numbers about how the TVS makes way more TQ down low. I believe the TVS is a great blower and the GEN 3R is a great product but I'm just curious as to why this new Odin is very low on TQ? Basically on straight pump it makes 702whp. That's 48whp less without boostane. If it's only making 555TQ at 750 then what's the TQ at 702? 530? 520?
That seems to be the trend with modern PD blowers. As they seek to attain more efficiency and flow then seem to trade off lower end power to higher end power.

Only dyno test I can get behind is both there same day, back to back dyno pulls. I’m sure someone has done it I just don’t recall who
 

Roh92cp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Threads
79
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
1,169
Location
Fort Kent Maine
First Name
Shawn
Vehicle(s)
OW GTPP Whipple
Can you post the dyno sheet so that we can see what we’re looking at?
Here’s VMP’s own results using a 3.00” upper and some Boostane, but, they’re using a smaller TB.
For those that can’t be bothered watching, 805/595 SAE 0 smoothing, 796/590 STD smoothing 5.


Or, are you referring to this pull here, where the torque curve quite obviously takes a dive right around the point where a TVS typically does it’s best work?
F36B97C0-8A3F-4149-9E9F-B404267FEC61.png
They don’t seem to mention in the video that this pull was made without intake pipe, filter or airbox attached. You can see the mono blade throttle body here at 49 seconds into the video.
E046DA8E-50A1-425E-89FF-DE4C5ECE3C11.jpeg
 
OP
OP
Platinum_5.0

Platinum_5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2018
Threads
12
Messages
416
Reaction score
190
Location
Edmonton, Canada
First Name
Daniel
Vehicle(s)
2021 10R Whipple
They don’t seem to mention in the video that this pull was made without intake pipe, filter or airbox attached. You can see the mono blade throttle body here at 49 seconds into the video.
E046DA8E-50A1-425E-89FF-DE4C5ECE3C11.jpeg
Wow...good catch. That's pretty odd
 

Sponsored

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,542
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
They don’t seem to mention in the video that this pull was made without intake pipe, filter or airbox attached. You can see the mono blade throttle body here at 49 seconds into the video.
E046DA8E-50A1-425E-89FF-DE4C5ECE3C11.jpeg
Good pickup. My question now is where the hell is the MAF sensor located?
 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,542
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
As long as both cars r setup the same, using one driver at the same track on the same day then Solarflare is right.

This is the only way to do this test
The track will show which car has the most Hp (all else being equal).
It won’t show which car has the most torque, which means it won’t show you which car will throw you back in your seat the hardest.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again but with a better explanation this time.

Car A makes 600tq at 3000rpm (343hp) Torque drops off to 500 by 7000rpm (666hp)
Car B makes peak torque of 500 at 8k (761hp)

Car B is pushing 100 hp more than Car A and will clearly win the race but car B pushes you into your seat 20% harder at 3000 rpm than car A does at any point in it’s rpm range.

Torque is what makes your passenger shit their pants as their body tries to end up in the back seat, Hp is what gets you across the line sooner.

Acceleration = Force x mass. Hp is NOT a force. Torque is the force. Hp is what you arrive at when you apply torque over a time period.
 

Burkey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Threads
87
Messages
5,542
Reaction score
3,521
Location
Australia
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
They probably tuned it via speed density
I wonder if this would help explain why the results from this particular car aren’t consistent with other results...
 

Stymee

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2019
Threads
59
Messages
3,366
Reaction score
1,696
Location
Delray Beach, Fl.
First Name
Joel
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT
The track will show which car has the most Hp (all else being equal).
It won’t show which car has the most torque, which means it won’t show you which car will throw you back in your seat the hardest.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again but with a better explanation this time.

Car A makes 600tq at 3000rpm (343hp) Torque drops off to 500 by 7000rpm (666hp)
Car B makes peak torque of 500 at 8k (761hp)

Car B is pushing 100 hp more than Car A and will clearly win the race but car B pushes you into your seat 20% harder at 3000 rpm than car A does at any point in it’s rpm range.

Torque is what makes your passenger shit their pants as their body tries to end up in the back seat, Hp is what gets you across the line sooner.

Acceleration = Force x mass. Hp is NOT a force. Torque is the force. Hp is what you arrive at when you apply torque over a time period.
Maybe there’s some truth to your post but in the end, the car that wins is where the people gather around?

But me personally I love torque
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 




Top