Sponsored

This look good

samd1351

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Threads
107
Messages
838
Reaction score
1,489
Location
Olathe, KS
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT, 1999 Ranger
20201015_195411.webp


Not sure if these are great, good, okay, or bro you suck.

Trying to figure out how to get Track Addict footage postable.
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
samd1351

samd1351

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Threads
107
Messages
838
Reaction score
1,489
Location
Olathe, KS
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT, 1999 Ranger
Thanks for the input. I really don't know if those are good or not. Sounds like they're on the low/slow side. Which is kind of what I was guessing at. Which just means I lots of upward mobility!:crazy:
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
7,080
Reaction score
6,348
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP w/ Voodoo
Vehicle Showcase
1
Stock tires can manage probably 1.10-1.15g, possibly a bit more. Just depends on the track surface. Braking probably 1.0+ as well. Accel is limited by engine power and gearing. I get 0.71 but better than stock tires
 
OP
OP
samd1351

samd1351

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2018
Threads
107
Messages
838
Reaction score
1,489
Location
Olathe, KS
First Name
Sam
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT, 1999 Ranger
Well now I look like the complete scrub that I am! I'm also not on stock Pirelli tires. Cooper Zeons. Definitely looking at springs and dampers. And squaring the setup.
 

Sponsored

17Magnetic5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Threads
26
Messages
647
Reaction score
332
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2017 premium mustang gt black accent package
2ED50B62-A2A5-4B2D-A6A2-C7F6D636725C.webp

Here’s mine. I don’t track it just regular street driving. I’m fairly certain it doesn’t record the data correctly. I can’t think of a turn where I could’ve pulled 1.5 G’s on my old factory square 255 pirellis. I’ve since upgraded to wider Michelin’s but even then I doubt these would hold that level of grip on the street. The braking I could maybe see as I’ve done a couple of 140 pulls recently and slowed down fairly fast but I would still doubt it being 1.5 G’s.
 

17Magnetic5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Threads
26
Messages
647
Reaction score
332
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2017 premium mustang gt black accent package
You need to reset it once, then it records correctlyish.
I have in the past before that one. When I first got the car I would look at it a lot and reset it to see what the highest I could get was and every once in a while I go in and reset it too since I know the values are ridiculous and I want to see what g’s I’m actually getting but somehow they always go up pretty high. I wonder if the max is 1.5?
 

17Magnetic5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Threads
26
Messages
647
Reaction score
332
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2017 premium mustang gt black accent package
That's weird. Especially since your laterals are wildly different. I would assume that it's not reading correctly, but good luck getting it fixed. Probably best to run a real accelerometer if you want real data anyway.
Yeah I think it’s an issue with the way Ford programmed it. I also read that it defaults to 1.5 after calibration. But hey at least I can tell the kids in the Honda Civics that my car pulls 1.5 G’s.
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
7,080
Reaction score
6,348
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP w/ Voodoo
Vehicle Showcase
1
Well now I look like the complete scrub that I am! I'm also not on stock Pirelli tires. Cooper Zeons. Definitely looking at springs and dampers. And squaring the setup.
Just look at the tires!

Dampers can help a little over uneven ground or in transition, springs help transition a lot but neither of those will add to steady state grip, that’s the tires role.
Sponsored

 
 








Top