doulos4jc
......looking^
Why are you all excited!? Test driving on Sept 20....I expect to get my Mustang in my garage before that!!
+1 :shrug:I hope to be test driving mine by then. ;)
Sponsored
Why are you all excited!? Test driving on Sept 20....I expect to get my Mustang in my garage before that!!
+1 :shrug:I hope to be test driving mine by then. ;)
Forget that. Go hit up an dyno. We need to know HORSEPOWER/TORQUE.locate the nearest weigh station and test drive it straight there please...you will be the hero of the interweb.
Huh? I think hp/tq measurement is standardized throughout the industry and the measurement is made at the flywheel. Ford did have an issue with late 90s cobras not making their advertised horsepower, so I think within standard deviation they err on the side of more vs. less these days. And that's coolWe also know that Ford doesn't gimmick with the HP/TQ #'s. They give you the actual HP/TQ to the ground, not before it goes through the drivetrain, so w/e Chevy and Dodge say their HP is, take off at least 10% drivetrain loss.

From what I was told by a friend that knows infinitely more than I do about cars (who also built custom engines for a living for awhile) told me what I stated above. I would have to agree with him over you guys ;) lol sorry.Huh? I think hp/tq measurement is standardized throughout the industry and the measurement is made at the flywheel. Ford did have an issue with late 90s cobras not making their advertised horsepower, so I think within standard deviation they err on the side of more vs. less these days. And that's cool
What's even cooler is that the new ecoboost will make similar hp and more torque than those same said cobras of yore ;)
Thats not true considering you can read peoples dyno results from previous stangs, compared to what they are spec'ed at.From what I was told by a friend that knows infinitely more than I do about cars (who also built custom engines for a living for awhile) told me what I stated above. I would have to agree with him over you guys ;) lol sorry.
Manufacturers test to SAE standard J1349 - its even written down and everything, so everyone has the same rules. ;) The SAE standard is for a flywheel HP number, with all common belt driven and other accessories that sap power in place on the engine. It does not account for drivetrain losses due to friction, etc, so it is not an "at the wheels" number. This can be verified by comparing pretty much anybody's stock dyno numbers to the OEM claim.From what I was told by a friend that knows infinitely more than I do about cars (who also built custom engines for a living for awhile) told me what I stated above. I would have to agree with him over you guys ;) lol sorry.
Touche! He's more of an acquaintance anyways ;) lolManufacturers test to SAE standard J1349 - its even written down and everything, so everyone has the same rules. ;) The SAE standard is for a flywheel HP number, with all common belt driven and other accessories that sap power in place on the engine. It does not account for drivetrain losses due to friction, etc, so it is not an "at the wheels" number. This can be verified by comparing pretty much anybody's stock dyno numbers to the OEM claim.
What's more is that the industry has moved to adopting "SAE Certified" power numbers, which uses standard J2723 to verify the output of running an engine to standard J1349. Its an industry-wide standard; no manufacturer reports wheel horsepower numbers since there are too many variables and it opens up the same sort of unregulated pissing contest that trailer tow ratings have.
Bottom line is your buddy is wrong. :shrug:
I have to believe there is some way that manufacturers are able to fudge the numbers. For instance, the new M4 has been revealed to be making about as much HP at the wheels as its published rating. I know there are correction factors involved that result in some margin of error, but usually not 40-60HP worth...Manufacturers test to SAE standard J1349 - its even written down and everything, so everyone has the same rules. ;) The SAE standard is for a flywheel HP number, with all common belt driven and other accessories that sap power in place on the engine. It does not account for drivetrain losses due to friction, etc, so it is not an "at the wheels" number. This can be verified by comparing pretty much anybody's stock dyno numbers to the OEM claim.
What's more is that the industry has moved to adopting "SAE Certified" power numbers, which uses standard J2723 to verify the output of running an engine to standard J1349. Its an industry-wide standard; no manufacturer reports wheel horsepower numbers since there are too many variables and it opens up the same sort of unregulated pissing contest that trailer tow ratings have.
Bottom line is your buddy is wrong. :shrug:
See here for a discussion on the "ok to sell" date. The OP might be driving before most (if not all) of us.If history is any guide, cars will start to trickle into dealerships and garages late August/ early September.
Yea I saw that. For me it's way too early in the game to get worked up about dates and times. Money is a huge motivator...Ford not making $$$$ on MY2015's until late in October!? Sounds kinda far fetched to me. My money is on September(at least).See here for a discussion on the "ok to sell" date. The OP might be driving before most (if not all) of us.