Sponsored

Supercharger Install

TorkN8R

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Threads
48
Messages
740
Reaction score
122
Location
Northern California Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium Ingot Silver Auto W/3.55's
As far as PD superchargers go, the top two front runners or most common purchase and install on the form have been the FRPP/Roush and the Whipple.

I've read and gone over both installation instruction for both. The install for the FRPP/Roush is a bit more complicated and having to cut and grind on the block is beyond rediculous.

The install of the Whipple is alot less complicated and NO CUT and GRIND on the block. :thumbsup:

Does anyone have any insight as to why with the Whipple install they also don't have all of the cutting and splicing of wires and tubing that is required with the FRPP/Roush?

Such as the = BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM AND ASPIRATOR HOSE ASSEMBLY
MODIFICATION and the EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS CANISTER PURGE VALVE WIRING?
So why all the mods on the one and not the other?
Sponsored

 

Apollo_1092

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Threads
6
Messages
124
Reaction score
10
Location
TX
First Name
Brandon
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
As far as PD superchargers go, the top two front runners or most common purchase and install on the form have been the FRPP/Roush and the Whipple.

I've read and gone over both installation instruction for both. The install for the FRPP/Roush is a bit more complicated and having to cut and grind on the block is beyond rediculous.

The install of the Whipple is alot less complicated and NO CUT and GRIND on the block. :thumbsup:

Does anyone have any insight as to why with the Whipple install they also don't have all of the cutting and splicing of wires and tubing that is required with the FRPP/Roush?

Such as the = BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM AND ASPIRATOR HOSE ASSEMBLY
MODIFICATION and the EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS CANISTER PURGE VALVE WIRING?
So why all the mods on the one and not the other?
^^This. I'm very curious as well.
 

Rubedog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Threads
11
Messages
267
Reaction score
64
Location
South Bay CA
Vehicle(s)
2015 PP Magnetic 5.0 Redline Recaro
As far as PD superchargers go, the top two front runners or most common purchase and install on the form have been the FRPP/Roush and the Whipple.

I've read and gone over both installation instruction for both. The install for the FRPP/Roush is a bit more complicated and having to cut and grind on the block is beyond rediculous.

The install of the Whipple is alot less complicated and NO CUT and GRIND on the block. :thumbsup:

Does anyone have any insight as to why with the Whipple install they also don't have all of the cutting and splicing of wires and tubing that is required with the FRPP/Roush?

Such as the = BRAKE BOOSTER VACUUM AND ASPIRATOR HOSE ASSEMBLY
MODIFICATION and the EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS CANISTER PURGE VALVE WIRING?
So why all the mods on the one and not the other?
Add me to the why list!
 
OP
OP

TorkN8R

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Threads
48
Messages
740
Reaction score
122
Location
Northern California Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium Ingot Silver Auto W/3.55's
I should add that I get why there is no cut and grind on the block with the Whipple...It's just a better engineered product.

But the cutting and splicing of wire harnesses and all the connector pin removal and relocate as well as the brake vacume tube Frankin Stiening remains a real mystery.
 

Sponsored

Apollo_1092

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Threads
6
Messages
124
Reaction score
10
Location
TX
First Name
Brandon
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
I should add that I get why there is no cut and grind on the block with the Whipple...It's just a better engineered product.

But the cutting and splicing of wire harnesses and all the connector pin removal and relocate as well as the brake vacume tube Frankin Stiening remains a real mystery.
You would also think that Roush would be the "better engineered" product that would not require cutting and grinding pieces of the car because they worked with FRPP. That's what blows my mind. I was really considering the FRPP route but remembering that there was so much more invasive stuff that had to happen has pushed me back to Whipple
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

TorkN8R

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Threads
48
Messages
740
Reaction score
122
Location
Northern California Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium Ingot Silver Auto W/3.55's
Because front inlet on Whipple vs rear inlet on the Roush. Go read on Whipple's site if ya want all the detail.
Thanks! I've read up on all the details and the installation instructions. It's not a question the the Whipple front feed is a better set up.

None of that answers any of the questions from the OP.
 
OP
OP

TorkN8R

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Threads
48
Messages
740
Reaction score
122
Location
Northern California Bay Area
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT Premium Ingot Silver Auto W/3.55's
You would Alps think that Roush would be the "better engineered" product that would not require cutting and grinding pieces of the car because they worked with FRPP. That's what blows my mind. I was really considering the FRPP route but remembering that there was so much more invasive stuff that had to happen has pushed me back to Whipple
Agreed! Not to mention the unkindest cut of all the cutting of the K-Brace. :headbonk:
 

Apollo_1092

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2015
Threads
6
Messages
124
Reaction score
10
Location
TX
First Name
Brandon
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
Agreed! Not to mention the unkindest cut of all the cutting of the K-Brace. :headbonk:
Yeah. I was really wanting to go the FRPP route because I felt like that would allow me to sleep better at night knowing it was made in collaboration with Ford. But now I think I can live with the Whipple as long as it's installed by a good shop and the Whipple tune is safe.
 

Sponsored

Kahboom

Kahboom
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Threads
26
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
184
Location
Cathedral City, CA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GTPP, Recaros/2014 Explorer Sport 4X4
I was considering the FRPP in the future due to being emissions legal in California but after hearing this I think I would be better off using the Whipple.
 

Kyle@ROUSH

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
440
Reaction score
165
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2003 Mach 1
I can understand it sounds a little intimidating when you first hear you need to cut but its really not a large amount or anything really difficult. It's necessary to create clearance for the FEAD system and retain a factory appearance.





I'll also toss in the one showing the valley modification,



We've required this modification since the release of the 5.0L in 2011 and have never had issues with this setup.

As for the K brace cut, its necessary to clear given the rear inlet, but again we wouldn't have done it that way had we felt it had a negative effect.





 

SVTFreak

#275
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Threads
60
Messages
3,478
Reaction score
733
Location
Prairieville, LA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Wimbledon white LE #275 A6
I've done 3 now. The grinding is easy peasy.

Kyle, when has grinding in the valley become necessary? I didn't have to on any that I did (11, 12 and 13). Is that new for 15? What's changed, the kit or the motor?
 

Kyle@ROUSH

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
440
Reaction score
165
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
2003 Mach 1
As for the boss I'd have to get back with one of our engineers, but I can say the lower intake is not the same part from previous kits, its a new intake.
 

SVTFreak

#275
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Threads
60
Messages
3,478
Reaction score
733
Location
Prairieville, LA
Vehicle(s)
2015 Wimbledon white LE #275 A6
As for the boss I'd have to get back with one of our engineers, but I can say the lower intake is not the same part from previous kits, its a new intake.

I'm going to assume it's a lower profile intake due to lower hoodline then. Thanks.
Sponsored

 
 








Top