TheLion
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Just looking for feedback on both setups. I've been leaning towards the former for a while, but I"ve also seen a lot of good feedback on the latter. I believe the latter will provide slightly better track performance with roughly the same street comfort. It is my understanding that on the dual rates the fronts at 230 lbs/in progressing into 350 lbs/in and the rears are 800ish lbs/in progressing up to 1200 lbs/in. I had the Ford Performance Street X springs on my ecoboost and really liked the balance of the progressive springs (assuming the softer coils aren't fully compressed at ride height, otherwise they only serve to keep the spring in the strut at full extension), but based on what I've read, Steeda's Dual Rates do seem to work in the lesser region at ride height.
SP083's are linear's at 250 / 980. Running GT350R bars with the SP083 / FP Track strut setup would give nearly identical bar, spring and damping as the GT350R with just a hair more spring in the rear giving the car a bit more traction / throttle steer on exit, but I doubt you could tell the difference.
I'm wondering how the steeda setup compares if I run stock bars with it to the GT350R like setup. For track the consensus is to run more spring and less bar, so you get the anti-roll without loosing as much wheel motion independence making the car more planted and providing more ultimate grip. More bar and less spring seems to be more popular for a street setup to keep ride quality good without compromising handling too much. Keep in mind that I am running factory 40 profile tires, so the tire is not as ridiculously stiff as a 30 series, it does provide some minor damping.
It would be really nice to hear some feed back on both setups and what you do / do not like about either. The cost of the Steeda springs / adjustable dampers is about the same as the cost of the SP083's / FP Track Dampers / GT350R OE Bars, it's just a matter of which one will give me the best balance of handling and ride with a greater emphasis on handling, especially on somewhat bumpy roads and at this point I'm thinking the steeda setup might be a bit better.
SP083's are linear's at 250 / 980. Running GT350R bars with the SP083 / FP Track strut setup would give nearly identical bar, spring and damping as the GT350R with just a hair more spring in the rear giving the car a bit more traction / throttle steer on exit, but I doubt you could tell the difference.
I'm wondering how the steeda setup compares if I run stock bars with it to the GT350R like setup. For track the consensus is to run more spring and less bar, so you get the anti-roll without loosing as much wheel motion independence making the car more planted and providing more ultimate grip. More bar and less spring seems to be more popular for a street setup to keep ride quality good without compromising handling too much. Keep in mind that I am running factory 40 profile tires, so the tire is not as ridiculously stiff as a 30 series, it does provide some minor damping.
It would be really nice to hear some feed back on both setups and what you do / do not like about either. The cost of the Steeda springs / adjustable dampers is about the same as the cost of the SP083's / FP Track Dampers / GT350R OE Bars, it's just a matter of which one will give me the best balance of handling and ride with a greater emphasis on handling, especially on somewhat bumpy roads and at this point I'm thinking the steeda setup might be a bit better.
Sponsored