z06psi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2015
- Threads
- 72
- Messages
- 4,157
- Reaction score
- 1,396
- Location
- Evans, GA.
- First Name
- Andrew
- Vehicle(s)
- The pot stirrer
And mine starts on 16 July.
Sponsored
That's awesome, man.I'm a mod friendly dealer only 1.5hr south from you fee free to get in touch I'll look at the car for you no charge
Mine is being shipped from Utah to Beefcake on July 6th so I will found out shortly as well. Just hoping that everything goes well. I confident that IF there is any issues Beef/Lund will make sure I leave happy. I will also update everyone one the final product.And mine starts on 16 July.
As stated, after reading these threads the last thing we care about is someone else's tune. (We have seen plenty, including Lunds many times over)Lund is not going to send a tune file.. lol
They just won't do that.


Sorry man, you're going to love the Whipple after all your imrc headaches. I just got off a Mustang dyno and with the best Lund tune I've got I put down 608rwhp and 489 torque at 11.9 psi. Ran a new revision but my subsequent runs all dropped power and torque. Not sure why. Maybe I should have fuse 62 pulled anytime I dyno? Is that a good idea to do?Picked the car up today. Shop said that they were able to get a hold of everything from Ford that relates to the IMRC system for the 15. Found everything has proper vacuum and voltage when activated and deactivated. However, when the vent line is hooked up to the intake and solenoids are plugged in, the IMRC closes when it hits 3k RPMS or boost. He said it doesn't make sense as he would think that the boost would force them open, not closed, the way they are designed. The only way to get them to stay open is to unplug both solenoids to the IMRC and keep the vent line unplugged from intake.
They were able to stick a camera down into the manifold to see the valves and everything looked good. The only thing they can think of is that the computer isn’t commanding the IMRC to open. Also, mentioned I could take the intake manifold off just to get a look at the IMRC valves from a different angle to make sure there isn’t anything that looks out of place.
As of now, it looks like the kit is pending sale to a forum member. I just wanted to update this thread in case anyone ever had an issue with their IMRC. Good luck to all with the Procharger kits. They do sound BA and make some damn good power. If you are having any doubts in the kit, just look around. Sam @ coastal is making great power with his, Boostworks is making over 700… and damn… Process is making over 800…
What size pulley? I would think you would be in the 650rwhp range @ 12 psi. Not every dyno reads the same.Sorry man, you're going to love the Whipple after all your imrc headaches. I just got off a Mustang dyno and with the best Lund tune I've got I put down 608rwhp and 489 torque at 11.9 psi. Ran a new revision but my subsequent runs all dropped power and torque. Not sure why. Maybe I should have fuse 62 pulled anytime I dyno? Is that a good idea to do?
At 12psi basically I'm feeling like I ought to be reaching into the 700 range, but I'm a long ways off.
Is this with a ProCharger canned tune or custom tune?I'm running a 5" crank pulley and an 8" dedicated 8-rib stage 2 pulley. Mustang dyno read it between 11.4 and 11.9 psi on all 5 pulls I did today. I had a mechanical boost gauge that read it on another days pulls with this tune peaking in the 11psi range at peak, about 7200-7400 rpm.
Dyno to dyno comparison, with 100 octane in the tank, my 93 tune made 587 / 470 at 11.4 psi on a Mustang Dyno today, and 612 / 489 on a dynojet with everything the same.
Best run on the Mustang Dyno today was 608 / 489 on a Race revision with just a touch more timing. I had a Race V2 with even a little more timing, but it made less power. I'm wondering if heat soak was an issue.
At 12 psi, what are you making?