Sponsored

OEM Speaker Comparison

Evolvd

Instigator
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Threads
172
Messages
6,322
Reaction score
5,108
Location
Northwest Florida
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
2021 Shelby GT500
While installing sound treatment on my newly acquired 2017 EcoBoost the door speakers caught my eye because of their material. I own a 2021 GT500 as well which I’ve completely upgraded the audio so I had the OEM B&O speakers out to compare to my 2017 9-speaker units.

IMG_1504.jpeg


On the left is the 2021 B&O 6.5” midbass and on the right is the same speaker from the 2017. I find it interesting they’d use a paper cone on the “upgraded” audio speakers and a poly cone on the “mid grade”.

IMG_1505.jpeg


For the 3.5” midrange it’s the opposite. In this photo the right speaker is the B&O polypropylene cone unit and the left is the 2017 paper cone unit.

Now this post is by no means an all-inclusive comparison. Just some interesting changes I noticed between the years and audio packages. I have since installed the poly 3.5” mids into my 2017 as I’m more concerned with longevity of the poly over paper cones. I did not notice any appreciable sound difference between the two.

Thanks for reading!
Sponsored

 

TonyNJ

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
2,079
Reaction score
3,029
Location
Northern NJ
Website
www.instagram.com
First Name
Tony
Vehicle(s)
22 GT500HE Black Stripes, 20 GT350HE, 16 GT350R Ba
Interesting. B&O kind of cheaped out in some areas. I noticed that of all the stereo in the S550s I've had, the Shaker 1000 in a 2018 was the best. Didn't take it apart to compare speakers though. It just sounded better when turned up louder. 🤷‍♂️
 

IPOGT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
62
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Southern Long Island Section Of Florida
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1 Velocity Blue M6
Tony,
B&O was always more of a name that was associated with style and sound.
IMO, they never made anything that was sound quality wise truly excellent. No McIntosh if you will. Not even a JBL.
Probobly more like a result of a simple licensing agreement, and since most B&O stuff wasn’t that great anyway, a good revenue stream for them.
A smarter move for Ford IMO, would have been to skip paying the licensing for the “radio” and instead let JBL design a speaker for the Ford system we call “B&O”. I think that would’ve turned out much better.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Evolvd

Evolvd

Instigator
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Threads
172
Messages
6,322
Reaction score
5,108
Location
Northwest Florida
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
2021 Shelby GT500
B&O provided the tuning from what I’ve gathered. Everything else is just Ford OEM junk parts.
 

IPOGT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
62
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Southern Long Island Section Of Florida
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1 Velocity Blue M6
B&O provided the tuning from what I’ve gathered. Everything else is just Ford OEM junk parts.
Like trying to put whipped cream on a crap sundae and even the whipped cream isn’t that good.
 

Sponsored

IPOGT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
62
Messages
4,123
Reaction score
4,868
Location
Southern Long Island Section Of Florida
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1 Velocity Blue M6
While installing sound treatment on my newly acquired 2017 EcoBoost the door speakers caught my eye because of their material. I own a 2021 GT500 as well which I’ve completely upgraded the audio so I had the OEM B&O speakers out to compare to my 2017 9-speaker units.

IMG_1504.jpeg


On the left is the 2021 B&O 6.5” midbass and on the right is the same speaker from the 2017. I find it interesting they’d use a paper cone on the “upgraded” audio speakers and a poly cone on the “mid grade”.

IMG_1505.jpeg


For the 3.5” midrange it’s the opposite. In this photo the right speaker is the B&O polypropylene cone unit and the left is the 2017 paper cone unit.

Now this post is by no means an all-inclusive comparison. Just some interesting changes I noticed between the years and audio packages. I have since installed the poly 3.5” mids into my 2017 as I’m more concerned with longevity of the poly over paper cones. I did not notice any appreciable sound difference between the two.

Thanks for reading!
The speaker on the left looks like a bigger version of a speaker I took out of a Radio Shack scanner in 1986. :cwl:
 

S550HPP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2024
Threads
22
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
682
Location
PDC
Vehicle(s)
2022 HPP Vert
First Gen Audison Thesis 6.5 are legendary even today. They cost $2K +/- and pull $1500-2K on used market in perfect shape today usually sell within hours when authenticated somehow.

They were paper. Thesis changed to synthetic on current version.

I was tempted by a local guy who bought a storage container and unearthed some NOS thesis but would not
give me a straight price. That was months ago he's still trying to sell with out a price haha.
 
Last edited:

PoCoBob

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
387
Reaction score
455
Location
Port Coquitlam B.C.
First Name
Bob
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT Premium, 2016 Edge Sport
While installing sound treatment on my newly acquired 2017 EcoBoost the door speakers caught my eye because of their material. I own a 2021 GT500 as well which I’ve completely upgraded the audio so I had the OEM B&O speakers out to compare to my 2017 9-speaker units.

IMG_1504.jpeg


On the left is the 2021 B&O 6.5” midbass and on the right is the same speaker from the 2017. I find it interesting they’d use a paper cone on the “upgraded” audio speakers and a poly cone on the “mid grade”.

IMG_1505.jpeg


For the 3.5” midrange it’s the opposite. In this photo the right speaker is the B&O polypropylene cone unit and the left is the 2017 paper cone unit.

Now this post is by no means an all-inclusive comparison. Just some interesting changes I noticed between the years and audio packages. I have since installed the poly 3.5” mids into my 2017 as I’m more concerned with longevity of the poly over paper cones. I did not notice any appreciable sound difference between the two.

Thanks for reading!
The difference in the top picture is the poly speaker on the right is a woofer. They are in the lower door on the 9 speaker systems. The B&O systems have a sub woofer so I don't think (but not positive) the lower door speaker is a woofer.

How big are the magnets on the back?
 
OP
OP
Evolvd

Evolvd

Instigator
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Threads
172
Messages
6,322
Reaction score
5,108
Location
Northwest Florida
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
2021 Shelby GT500
The difference in the top picture is the poly speaker on the right is a woofer. They are in the lower door on the 9 speaker systems. The B&O systems have a sub woofer so I don't think (but not positive) the lower door speaker is a woofer.

How big are the magnets on the back?
The subwoofer is in the trunk on B&O systems. Both are 6.5” in the lower doors and are mid-bass woofers that dont really start coming alive until around 80 hz. The magnet on the B&O is slightly larger which makes sense due to the increased power output by the amp in the B&O system.
 

Sponsored

Dans18GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
120
Reaction score
77
Location
Modesto CA
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT
Being poly doesn't necessarily mean it's better. I had to replace a blown door speaker in my '18
 

Jaymar

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
1,141
Reaction score
1,361
Location
Portland, OR
First Name
Jaymar
Vehicle(s)
2022 GT/CS - Rapid Red
Some of my favorite speakers have been paper, the material and magnet don't matter when it comes to sound. It's easy to see them but many other components go into making a sound from any particular speaker. Overall I'd rate the factory Mustang system solidly mediocre. It's the greige of audio systems. I'm not ever unhappy with it but it sure won't stand out against anything else you ever put it to. I have a full system meant for my last car to put in yet I can never manage to find the time to care that much about it.
 

Bullit69

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
115
Reaction score
67
Location
Texas
First Name
Manny
Vehicle(s)
19 Mustang GT Premium Convertible
What speakers is everyone using to update with. I’ve been checking out the Focals, they have some nice three way systems.
 
OP
OP
Evolvd

Evolvd

Instigator
Joined
Jan 19, 2015
Threads
172
Messages
6,322
Reaction score
5,108
Location
Northwest Florida
First Name
Brian
Vehicle(s)
2021 Shelby GT500
Being poly doesn't necessarily mean it's better. I had to replace a blown door speaker in my '18
Didn’t see anyone claim such. However, when exposed to the elements (as door speakers are) I’d rather have a poly cone than a pressed paper cone when it comes to garbage OEM speakers
Sponsored

 
 








Top