If that's the case, then at that point you're not really using the car to its full potential you might as well have bought a V6 and saved alot more than $30 a month.And someone will argue that you will not see the benefits of the minimal difference between using 87 octane vs premium octane for a daily driver unless dynoed. It's a complex argument.
gains in performance? you mean that 1hp gain? lol there is hardly any gains 1 to a MAYBE 5hp max on 93...but nothing you would ever notice except for on paper.There's a difference in getting jacked for an extra $30 a month on cable and not getting a single benefit vs. paying an extra $30 a month on gas and seeing some pretty decent gains in performance.
I would argue that 99% of us do not drive these cars to their full potential. Be it on the streets or at the race tracks. Gasoline type alone does not make the car fully potential.If that's the case, then at that point you're not really using the car to its full potential you might as well have bought a V6 and saved alot more than $30 a month.
It is a complex argument I agree and a lot of factors come into play like you just mentioned, but sometimes the logic around people's choice in gasoline octane astounds me.
Hell you mine as well buy a 80hp Geo then. It doesn't mean you need a V6 because you want to still use the recommended octane AND save a bit of money having the sound and torque/power available of a V8.If that's the case, then at that point you're not really using the car to its full potential you might as well have bought a V6 and saved alot more than $30 a month.
It is a complex argument I agree and a lot of factors come into play like you just mentioned, but sometimes the logic around people's choice in gasoline octane astounds me.
93 octane is made for high compression motors to prevent detonation in motors. Newer cars have ECUs that can retard timing to accommodate for the lower octane combustion with a trade off in decreased power output.Why do they make 93 oct? Is it a "scam like cai"?