For a DI Ecoboost, sure.
Couldnāt disagree more with this. I had put almost 70k on a DI vehicle without a catch can. I was tuned at 15k and not driven easy a lot of the time. Still had MAJOR carbon build up.I have a good friend that manages a large mechanic shop. We have talked in the past about the problems with carbon and DI. His thoughts on it are that most of the carbon buildup cars that come in are driving by people that almost never run the car to redline. He thinks it will always be a problem but the most problematic cars are low mileage and low usage driven by older people/slow drivers.
No fuel additive will touch it, since fuel never touches the backs of the valves. Get them cleaned manually, and install a catch can as prevention.So, is there a safe fuel additive that will help clear carbon build up?
EB with 74k, no catch can but definitely driven spiritedly.
Seafoam worked wonders on my Mini turbo 4 DI. Regardless, a walnut blast was still done every 60k miles or so. Would occasionally get a super knock to let me know it was time for a walnut blast.So, is there a safe fuel additive that will help clear carbon build up?
EB with 74k, no catch can but definitely driven spiritedly.
Of course not. Your GT has port fuel injection. The valves get cleaned by it.Seafoam worked wonders on my Mini turbo 4 DI. Regardless, a walnut blast was still done every 60k miles or so. Would occasionally get a super knock to let me know it was time for a walnut blast.
I have a catch can in my GT and yes it catches oil. Beyond that, I've noticed nothing.
Did you borescope?Couldnāt disagree more with this. I had put almost 70k on a DI vehicle without a catch can. I was tuned at 15k and not driven easy a lot of the time. Still had MAJOR carbon build up.
Third - there's many threads on here with folks who have not used any catch can and have thousands of miles with no detrimental affects.Unfortunately, early EcoBoost motors with direct injection will likely have these carbon deposits, and generally require a periodic cleaning to preserve the engineās drivability.
The 2015 model year marked the first major design changes for the Coyote since its introduction in 2011. And then again in 2018, the Coyote was thoroughly reworked, featuring dual-fuel, high pressure direct injection combined with low-pressure port fuel injection technology for increased power and efficiency.Of course not. Your GT has port fuel injection. The valves get cleaned by it.
Engine had been pulled apart for a rebuild to include new valves and springs. So I guess a step better than a borescopeDid you borescope?
Honestly, DI hasnāt been around for the 40 years of experience. But thatās besides the point.The problem is no fuel gets to the back side of the intake valve so nothing washes off the oil.
Lol. Love it when people are like ā well my car...ā
Maybe I should have made the 40 years of experience part and runs a large shop part more clear. Like I said DI without a manifold injector will always be a problem but his experience was cars that are driven hard have longer service intervals than cars that are never cleaned out. He also said the babied cars had much worse deposits than normally driven or hard driven cars.